The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences
Open accessAbstract
A database of 209 Drosophila introns was extracted from Genbank (release number 64.0) and examined by a number of methods in order to characterize features that might serve as signals for messenger RNA splicing. A tight distribution of sizes was observed: while the smallest introns in the database are 51 nucleotides, more than half are less than 80 nucleotides in length, and most of these have lengths in the range of 59-67 nucleotides. Drosophila splice sites found in large and small introns differ in only minor ways from each other and from those found in vertebrate introns. However, larger introns have greater pyrimidine-richness in the region between 11 and 21 nucleotides upstream of 3' splice sites. The Drosophila branchpoint consensus matrix resembles C T A A T (in which branch formation occurs at the underlined A), and differs from the corresponding mammalian signal in the absence of G at the position immediately preceding the branchpoint. The distribution of occurrences of this sequence suggests a minimum distance between 5' splice sites and branchpoints of about 38 nucleotides, and a minimum distance between 3' splice sites and branchpoints of 15 nucleotides. The methods we have used detect no information in exon sequences other than in the few nucleotides immediately adjacent to the splice sites. However, Drosophila resembles many other species in that there is a discontinuity in A + T content between exons and introns, which are A + T rich.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Novel Family of Divergent Seven-Transmembrane Proteins
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Freeman, M. R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., & Carlson, J. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,155
Intron—exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms
Long, M., & Deutsch, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.15.3219 · Cited by 417
Distributions of Exons and Introns in the Human Genome
Sakharkar, M. K., Chow, V. T. K., & Kangueane, P. (2004) · In Silico Biology: Journal of Biological Systems Modeling and Multi-Scale Simulation · doi:10.3233/isb-00142 · Cited by 328
Molecular phylogeny of the benthic shallow-water octopuses (Cephalopoda: Octopodinae)
Guzik, M. T., Norman, M. D., & Crozier, R. H. (2005) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.009 · Cited by 86
Intron size minimisation in teleosts
Jakt, L. M., Dubin, A., & Johansen, S. D. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08760-w · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Mount, S. M., Burks, C., Herts, G., Stormo, G. D., White, O., & Fields, C.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4255-4262
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2051490611
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/20.16.4255
- The paper
- Mount, S. M., Burks, C., Herts, G., Stormo, G. D., White, O., & Fields, C. (1992). Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.16.4255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.