The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Problems related to the interpretation of autoradiographic data on gene expression using common constitutive transcripts as controls
Open accessAbstract
The 28S rRNA, a ribosomal RNA, and the ACTB and GAPD mRNAs, coding respectively for beta-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), are frequently presented as controls of modulated gene expression. These transcripts were quantified by replicate slot-blot autoradiography and image analysis in mammary epithelial cells and fibroblasts from breast tissues. Each cell-type group comprised strains with different pathological backgrounds, growth rates, antigenic phenotypes and culture histories. The effects of a differentiating agent (cholera toxin) and/or a tumor promoter (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) were also examined. Despite the impression that visual examination of autoradiographs might create, image analysis suggests that 28S rRNA, ACTB and GAPD are substantially and independently influenced by the above biological factors and by the drugs. Therefore, these transcripts represent specifically regulated cellular activities and may not be taken as alternative indicators of the overall transcription rate or of the amount of material being examined. Instead, such nonspecific variation may be accurately measured and removed from quantitative data using a principal component function. A methodology that allows comparison of expression (or amplification) patterns between genes, between experiments or, even, between laboratories is presented with an example of quantification of transcripts related to cell-growth, differentiation, signaling and cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vandesompele, J., De Preter, K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Van Roy, N., De Paepe, A., & Speleman, F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · Cited by 20,038
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR – a perspective
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V, Nolan, T., & Pfaffl, M. W. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/jme.1.01755 · Cited by 1,321
Gutierrez, L., Mauriat, M., Guénin, S., Pelloux, J., Lefebvre, J., Louvet, R., Rusterucci, C., Moritz, T., Guerineau, F., Bellini, C., et al. (2008) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00346.x · Cited by 696
Metadata
- Authors
- Spanakis, E.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3809-3819
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2088265690
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problems related to the interpretation of autoradiographic data on gene expression using common constitutive transcripts as controls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/21.16.3809
- The paper
- Spanakis, E. (1993). Problems related to the interpretation of autoradiographic data on gene expression using common constitutive transcripts as controls. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.16.3809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.