The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of coding regions in genomic DNA sequences: an application of dynamic programming and neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Dynamic programming (DP) is applied to the problem of precisely identifying internal exons and introns in genomic DNA sequences. The program GeneParser first scores the sequence of interest for splice sites and for these intron- and exon-specific content measures: codon usage, local compositional complexity, 6-tuple frequency, length distribution and periodic asymmetry. This information is then organized for interpretation by DP. GeneParser employs the DP algorithm to enforce the constraints that introns and exons must be adjacent and non-overlapping and finds the highest scoring combination of introns and exons subject to these constraints. Weights for the various classification procedures are determined by training a simple feed-forward neural network to maximize the number of correct predictions. In a pilot study, the system has been trained on a set of 56 human gene fragments containing 150 internal exons in a total of 158,691 bps of genomic sequence. When tested against the training data, GeneParser precisely identifies 75% of the exons and correctly predicts 86% of coding nucleotides as coding while only 13% of non-exon bps were predicted to be coding. This corresponds to a correlation coefficient for exon prediction of 0.85. Because of the simplicity of the network weighting scheme, generalization performance is nearly as good as with the training set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Learning internal representations by error propagation
RUMELHART, D. E., HINTON, G. E., & WILLIAMS, R. J. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50035-2 · Cited by 3,002
Determination of eukaryotic protein coding regions using neural networks and information theory
Farber, R., Lapedes, A., & Sirotkin, K. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90961-i · Cited by 113
Cited by
Ab initio Gene Finding in Drosophila Genomic DNA
Salamov, A. A., & Solovyev, V. V. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.10.4.516 · Cited by 1,120
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, E. E., & Stormo, G. D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-613
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2025692710
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of coding regions in genomic DNA sequences: an application of dynamic programming and neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/21.3.607
- The paper
- Snyder, E. E., & Stormo, G. D. (1993). Identification of coding regions in genomic DNA sequences: an application of dynamic programming and neural networks. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.3.607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.