The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Bit Analysis: a solid phase method for typing single nucleotide polymorphisms
Open accessAbstract
A new method for typing single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA is described. In this method, specific fragments of genomic DNA containing the polymorphic site(s) are first amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using one regular and one phosphorothioate-modified primer. The double-stranded PCR product is rendered single-stranded by treatment with the enzyme T7 gene 6 exonuclease, and captured onto individual wells of a 96 well polystyrene plate by hybridization to an immobilized oligonucleotide primer. This primer is designed to hybridize to the single-stranded target DNA immediately adjacent from the polymorphic site of interest. Using the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I or the modified T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase), the 3' end of the capture oligonucleotide is extended by one base using a mixture of one biotin-labeled, one fluorescein-labeled, and two unlabeled dideoxynucleoside triphosphates. Antibody conjugates of alkaline phosphatase and horseradish peroxidase are then used to determine the nature of the extended base in an ELISA format. This paper describes biochemical features of this method in detail. A semi-automated version of the method, which we call Genetic Bit Analysis (GBA), is being used on a large scale for the parentage verification of thoroughbred horses using a predetermined set of 26 diallelic polymorphisms in the equine genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Genetic Analysis
Kerem, B.-S., Rommens, J. M., Buchanan, J. A., Markiewicz, D., Cox, T. K., Chakravarti, A., Buchwald, M., & Tsui, L.-C. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2570460 · Cited by 4,142
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Characterization of DNA Probes Immobilized on Gold Surfaces
Herne, T. M., & Tarlov, M. J. (1997) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9719586 · Cited by 1,541
Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms
Syvänen, A.-C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35103535 · Cited by 1,083
Universal DNA microarray method for multiplex detection of low abundance point mutations
Gerry, N. P., Witowski, N. E., Day, J., Hammer, R. P., Barany, G., & Barany, F. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3063 · Cited by 346
Mining SNPs From EST Databases
Picoult-Newberg, L., Ideker, T. E., Pohl, M. G., Taylor, S. L., Donaldson, M. A., Nickerson, D. A., & Boyce-Jacino, M. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.2.167 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikiforov, T. T., Rendie, R. B., Goelet, P., Rogers, Y.-H., Kotewicz, M. L., Anderson, S., Trainor, G. L., & Knapp, M. R.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4167-4175
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2137743001
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.