The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA
Open accessAbstract
Detection of differentially regulated genes has been severely hampered by technical limitations. In an effort to overcome these problems, the PCR-coupled subtractive process of representational difference analysis (RDA) [Lisitsyn, N. et al. (1993) Science 259, 946-951] has been adapted for use with cDNA. In a model system, RAG-1 and RAG-2, the genes responsible for activating V(D)J recombination, were identified in a genomic transfectant by cDNA RDA in a small fraction of the time taken by conventional means. The system was also modified to eliminate expected difference products to facilitate the identification of novel genes. Additional alterations to the conditions allowed isolation of differentially expressed fragments. Several caffeine up-regulated clones were obtained from the pre-B cell line 1-8, including IGF-1B, and a predicted homologue of the natural killer cell antigen, NKR-P1. The approach was found to be fast, extremely sensitive, reproducible, and predominantly lacked false positives. cDNA RDA has the capacity and adaptability to be applied to a wide range of biological problems, including the study of single gene disorders, characterization of mutant and complemented cell types, developmental or post-event expression time courses, and examination of pathogen-host interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Cited by
Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents
Davies, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1008 · Cited by 2,781
Zheng, W.-P., & Flavell, R. A. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80240-8 · Cited by 2,384
c-Myc transactivation of LDH-A : Implications for tumor metabolism and growth
Shim, H., Dolde, C., Lewis, B. C., Wu, C.-S., Dang, G., Jungmann, R. A., Dalla-Favera, R., & Dang, C. V. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.13.6658 · Cited by 1,092
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Shedding of Kidney Injury Molecule-1, a Putative Adhesion Protein Involved in Renal Regeneration
Bailly, V., Zhang, Z., Meier, W., Cate, R., Sanicola, M., & Bonventre, J. V. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m200562200 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubank, M., & Schatz, D. G.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 5640-5648
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2027590165
- Cited by
- 883
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/22.25.5640
- The paper
- Hubank, M., & Schatz, D. G. (1994). Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.25.5640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.