The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The presence of two distinct 8-oxoguanine repair enzymes in human cells: their potential complementary roles in preventing mutation
Open accessAbstract
8-Oxoguanine (8-oxoG), induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ionizing radiation, is arguably the most important mutagenic lesion in DNA. This oxidized base, because of its mispairing with A, induces GC-->TA transversion mutations often observed spontaneously in tumor cells. The human cDNA encoding the repair enzyme 8-oxoG-DNA glycosylase (OGG-1) has recently been cloned, however, its activity was never detected in cells. Here we show that the apparent lack of this activity could be due to the presence of an 8-oxoG-specific DNA binding protein. Moreover, we demonstrate the presence of two antigenically distinct OGG activities with an identical reaction mechanism in human cell (HeLa) extracts. The 38 kDa OGG-1, identical to the cloned enzyme, cleaves 8-oxoG when paired with cytosine, thymine and guanine but not adenine in DNA. In contrast, the newly discovered 36 kDa OGG-2 prefers 8-oxoG paired with G and A. We propose that OGG-1 and OGG-2 have distinct antimutagenic functions in vivo . OGG-1 prevents mutation by removing 8-oxoG formed in DNA in situ and paired with C, while OGG-2 removes 8-oxoG that is incorporated opposite A in DNA from ROS-induced 8-oxodGTP. We predict that OGG-2 specifically removes such 8-oxoG residues only from the nascent strand, possibly by utilizing the same mechanism as the DNA mismatch repair pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG
Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M., & Grollman, A. P. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349431a0 · Cited by 2,224
Cited by
Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease
Cooke, M. S., Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Lunec, J. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0752rev · Cited by 3,245
Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance
Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Cooke, M. S. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,372
Repair and Genetic Consequences of Endogenous DNA Base Damage in Mammalian Cells
Barnes, D. E., & Lindahl, T. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092448 · Cited by 753
Almeida, K. H., & Sobol, R. W. (2007) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.01.009 · Cited by 437
Olinski, R., Gackowski, D., Foksinski, M., Rozalski, R., Roszkowski, K., & Jaruga, P. (2002) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00878-x · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Hazra, T. K., Izumi, T., Mitra, S., Maidt, L., & Floyd, R. A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5116-5122
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2091403301
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The presence of two distinct 8-oxoguanine repair enzymes in human cells: their potential complementary roles in preventing mutation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/26.22.5116
- The paper
- Hazra, T. K., Izumi, T., Mitra, S., Maidt, L., & Floyd, R. A. (1998). The presence of two distinct 8-oxoguanine repair enzymes in human cells: their potential complementary roles in preventing mutation. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.22.5116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.