The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays
Open accessAbstract
To examine the utility and performance of 50mer oligonucleotide (oligonucleotide probe) microarrays, gene-specific oligonucleotide probes were spotted along with PCR probes onto glass microarrays and the performance of each probe type was evaluated. The specificity of oligonucleotide probes was studied using target RNAs that shared various degrees of sequence similarity. Sensitivity was defined as the ability to detect a 3-fold change in mRNA. No significant difference in sensitivity between oligonucleotide probes and PCR probes was observed and both had a minimum reproducible detection limit of approximately 10 mRNA copies/cell. Specificity studies showed that for a given oligonucleotide probe any 'non-target' transcripts (cDNAs) >75% similar over the 50 base target may show cross-hybridization. Thus non-target sequences which have >75-80% sequence similarity with target sequences (within the oligonucleotide probe 50 base target region) will contribute to the overall signal intensity. In addition, if the 50 base target region is marginally similar, it must not include a stretch of complementary sequence >15 contiguous bases. Therefore, knowledge about the target sequence, as well as its similarity to other mRNAs in the target tissue or RNA sample, is required to design successful oligonucleotide probes for quality microarray results. Together these results validate the utility of oligonucleotide probe (50mer) glass microarrays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs
Geiss, G. K., Bumgarner, R. E., Birditt, B., Dahl, T., Dowidar, N., Dunaway, D. L., Fell, H. P., Ferree, S., George, R. D., Grogan, T., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1385 · Cited by 2,066
Correlation of mRNA and protein in complex biological samples
Maier, T., Güell, M., & Serrano, L. (2009) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.036 · Cited by 1,802
Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers
Kivioja, T., Vähärautio, A., Karlsson, K., Bonke, M., Enge, M., Linnarsson, S., & Taipale, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1778 · Cited by 1,010
Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms
Irizarry, R. A., Warren, D., Spencer, F., Kim, I. F., Biswal, S., Frank, B. C., Gabrielson, E., Garcia, J. G. N., Geoghegan, J., Germino, G., et al. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth756 · Cited by 862
Reliability and reproducibility issues in DNA microarray measurements
DRAGHICI, S., KHATRI, P., EKLUND, A., & SZALLASI, Z. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.12.005 · Cited by 590
Metadata
- Authors
- Kane, M. D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-15
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4552-4557
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2097383747
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/28.22.4552
- The paper
- Kane, M. D. (2000). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of oligonucleotide (50mer) microarrays. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.22.4552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.