A computational scan for U12-dependent introns in the human genome sequence
Open accessAbstract
U12-dependent introns are found in small numbers in most eukaryotic genomes, but their scarcity makes accurate characterisation of their properties challenging. A computational search for U12-dependent introns was performed using the draft version of the human genome sequence. Human expressed sequences confirmed 404 U12-dependent introns within the human genome, a 6-fold increase over the total number of non-redundant U12-dependent introns previously identified in all genomes. Although most of these introns had AT-AC or GT-AG terminal dinucleotides, small numbers of introns with a surprising diversity of termini were found, suggesting that many of the non-canonical introns found in the human genome may be variants of U12-dependent introns and, thus, spliced by the minor spliceosome. Comparisons with U2-dependent introns revealed that the U12-dependent intron set lacks the 'short intron' peak characteristic of U2-dependent introns. Analysis of this U12-dependent intron set confirmed reports of a biased distribution of U12-dependent introns in the genome and allowed the identification of several alternative splicing events as well as a surprising number of apparent splicing errors. This new larger reference set of U12-dependent introns will serve as a resource for future studies of both the properties and evolution of the U12 spliceosome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
U12 intron splice sites can comprise a variety of dinucleotides including AT-AC, GT-AG, GT-GG, AT-AT or AT-AA.
“As U12 intron splice sites can comprise a variety of dinucleotides including AT-AC, GT-AG, GT-GG, AT-AT or AT-AA (46)”
From Integrating gene annotation with orthology inference at scale (2023) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating gene annotation with orthology inference at scale
Kirilenko, B. M., Munegowda, C., Osipova, E., Jebb, D., Sharma, V., Blumer, M., Morales, A. E., Ahmed, A.-W., Kontopoulos, D.-G., Hilgers, L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn3107 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levine, A., & Durbin, R.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- ORCID
- Durbin, Richard
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4006-4013
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC60238
- OpenAlex
- W2149783843
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- minor spliceosome, human genome, alternative splicing, splicing errors, spliceosome evolution
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Introns, Genome, Human, Alternative Splicing, Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear, Ribonucleoprotein, U2 Small Nuclear, Computational Biology, RNA Splice Sites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review