Cited by 15DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Biochemical characterisation of Mer3 helicase interactions and the protection of meiotic recombination intermediates

Open access
Altmannova, Veronika, Firlej, Magdalena, Müller, Franziska, Janning, Petra, Rauleder, Rahel, Rousova, Dorota, Schäffler, Andreas, Bange, Tanja +1 more·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Crossing over between homologs is critical for the stable segregation of chromosomes during the first meiotic division. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 (HFM1 in mammals) is a SF2 helicase and member of the ZMM group of proteins, that facilitates the formation of the majority of crossovers during meiosis. Here, we describe the structural organisation of Mer3 and using AlphaFold modelling and XL-MS we further characterise the previously described interaction with Mlh1–Mlh2. We find that Mer3 also forms a previously undescribed complex with the recombination regulating factors Top3 and Rmi1 and that this interaction is competitive with Sgs1BLM helicase. Using in vitro reconstituted D-loop assays we show that Mer3 inhibits the anti-recombination activity of Sgs1 helicase, but only in the presence of Dmc1. Thus we provide a mechanism whereby Mer3 interacts with a network of proteins to protect Dmc1 derived D-loops from dissolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkad175

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Altmannova, V., Firlej, M., Müller, F., Janning, P., Rauleder, R., Rousova, D., Schäffler, A., Bange, T., & Weir, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society , Max-Planck-Ring 9, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology (DE)
  • Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
Corresponding author
Weir, John R
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2023-03-21
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
4363-4384
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4328049435
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Max Planck Society and the German Research Foundation (WE 6513/2-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
meiotic recombination, crossing over, Sgs1 helicase, BLM helicase, DMC1, protein-protein interaction, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
MutL Proteins, MutL Protein Homolog 1, Binding, Competitive, Crossing Over, Genetic, DNA Helicases, DNA-Binding Proteins, Meiosis, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Folding, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, RecQ Helicases, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review