Cited by 1,673Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

g:Profiler—interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update)

Open access
Kolberg, Liis, Raudvere, Uku, Kuzmin, Ivan, Adler, Priit, Vilo, Jaak, Peterson, Hedi·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

g:Profiler is a reliable and up-to-date functional enrichment analysis tool that supports various evidence types, identifier types and organisms. The toolset integrates many databases, including Gene Ontology, KEGG and TRANSFAC, to provide a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of gene lists. It also provides interactive and intuitive user interfaces and supports ordered queries and custom statistical backgrounds, among other settings. g:Profiler provides multiple programmatic interfaces to access its functionality. These can be easily integrated into custom workflows and external tools, making them valuable resources for researchers who want to develop their own solutions. g:Profiler has been available since 2007 and is used to analyse millions of queries. Research reproducibility and transparency are achieved by maintaining working versions of all past database releases since 2015. g:Profiler supports 849 species, including vertebrates, plants, fungi, insects and parasites, and can analyse any organism through user-uploaded custom annotation files. In this update article, we introduce a novel filtering method highlighting Gene Ontology driver terms, accompanied by new graph visualizations providing a broader context for significant Gene Ontology terms. As a leading enrichment analysis and gene list interoperability service, g:Profiler offers a valuable resource for genetics, biology and medical researchers. It is freely accessible at https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkad347

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional enrichment analysis was done using the g:Profiler web interface, querying cluster markers against the GO biological process database with g:SCS multiple testing correction and a significance threshold of 0.05.

    “This was done using g:Profiler web interface, where the cluster markers were queried against GO biological process database, with g:SCS multiple testing correction method applying significance threshold of 0.05 (Kolberg et al, 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Cunningham F., Allen J.E., Allen J., Alvarez-Jarreta J., Amode M.R., Armean I.M., Austine-Orimoloye O., Azov A.G., Barnes I., Bennett R. et al. Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: D988– D995. 34791404 PMC8728283
  2. [2]Gillespie M., Jassal B., Stephan R., Milacic M., Rothfels K., Senff-Ribeiro A., Griss J., Sevilla C., Matthews L., Gong C. et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: D687– D692. 34788843 PMC8689983
  3. [3]Tsitsiridis G., Steinkamp R., Giurgiu M., Brauner B., Fobo G., Frishman G., Montrone C., Ruepp A. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes—2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51: D539– D545. 36382402 PMC9825459
  4. [4]Köhler S., Gargano M., Matentzoglu N., Carmody L.C., Lewis-Smith D., Vasilevsky N.A., Danis D., Balagura G., Baynam G., Brower A.M. et al. The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: D1207– D1217. 33264411 PMC7778952
  5. [6]Liao Y., Wang J., Jaehnig E.J., Shi Z., Zhang B. WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: W199– W205. 31114916 PMC6602449
  6. [7]Xie Z., Bailey A., Kuleshov M.V., Clarke D.J., Evangelista J.E., Jenkins S.L., Lachmann A., Wojciechowicz M.L., Kropiwnicki E., Jagodnik K.M. et al. Gene set knowledge discovery with Enrichr. Curr. Protocol. 2021; 1: e90. PMC8152575 33780170
  7. [8]Wu T., Hu E., Xu S., Chen M., Guo P., Dai Z., Feng T., Zhou L., Tang W., Zhan L. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation. 2021; 2: 100141. 34557778 PMC8454663
  8. [9]Mi H., Ebert D., Muruganujan A., Mills C., Albou L.-P., Mushayamaha T., Thomas P.D. PANTHER version 16: a revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: D394– D403. 33290554 PMC7778891
  9. [10]Sherman B.T., Hao M., Qiu J., Jiao X., Baseler M.W., Lane H.C., Imamichi T., Chang W. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: W216– W221. 35325185 PMC9252805
  10. [11]Wadi L., Meyer M., Weiser J., Stein L.D., Reimand J. Impact of outdated gene annotations on pathway enrichment analysis. Nat. Methods. 2016; 13: 705– 706. 27575621 PMC7802636
  11. [12]Raudvere U., Kolberg L., Kuzmin I., Arak T., Adler P., Peterson H., Vilo J. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: W191– W198. 31066453 PMC6602461
  12. [13]Yates A.D., Allen J., Amode R.M., Azov A.G., Barba M., Becerra A., Bhai J., Campbell L.I., Carbajo Martinez M., Chakiachvili M. et al. Ensembl Genomes 2022: an expanding genome resource for non-vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: D996– D1003. 34791415 PMC8728113
  13. [14]The Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: D325– D334. 33290552 PMC7779012
  14. [15]Howe K.L., Bolt B.J., Cain S., Chan J., Chen W.J., Davis P., Done J., Down T., Gao S., Grove C. et al. WormBase 2016: expanding to enable helminth genomic research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: D774– D780. 26578572 PMC4702863
  15. [16]Howe K.L., Bolt B.J., Shafie M., Kersey P., Berriman M. WormBase ParaSite—a comprehensive resource for helminth genomics. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2017; 215: 2– 10. 27899279 PMC5486357
  16. [18]Martens M., Ammar A., Riutta A., Waagmeester A., Slenter D.N., Hanspers K., Miller R.A., Digles D., Lopes E.N., Ehrhart F. et al. WikiPathways: connecting communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: D613– D621. 33211851 PMC7779061
  17. [19]Uhlén M., Fagerberg L., Hallström B.M., Lindskog C., Oksvold P., Mardinoglu A., Sivertsson Å., Kampf C., Sjöstedt E., Asplund A. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015; 347: 1260419. 25613900
  18. [20]Wingender E. The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation. Brief. Bioinform. 2008; 9: 326– 332. 18436575
  19. [21]Huang H.-Y., Lin Y.-C.-D., Cui S., Huang Y., Tang Y., Xu J., Bao J., Li Y., Wen J., Zuo H. et al. miRTarBase update 2022: an informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA–target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: D222– D230. 34850920 PMC8728135
  20. [22]Reimand J., Kull M., Peterson H., Hansen J., Vilo J. g:profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: W193– W200. 17478515 PMC1933153
  21. [23]Wijesooriya K., Jadaan S.A., Perera K.L., Kaur T., Ziemann M. Urgent need for consistent standards in functional enrichment analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022; 18: e1009935. 35263338 PMC8936487
  22. [24]Kolberg L., Raudvere U., Kuzmin I., Vilo J., Peterson H. gprofiler2—an R package for gene list functional enrichment analysis and namespace conversion toolset g:Profiler. F1000Research. 2020; 9: ELIXIR-709. PMC7859841 33564394
  23. [25]Afgan E., Nekrutenko A., Grüning B.A., Blankenberg D., Goecks J., Schatz M.C., Ostrovsky A.E., Mahmoud A., Lonie A.J., Syme A. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50: W345– W351. 35446428 PMC9252830
  24. [26]Savage S.R., Shi Z., Liao Y., Zhang B. Graph algorithms for condensing and consolidating gene set analysis results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2019; 18: S141– S152. 31142576 PMC6692773

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolberg, L., Raudvere, U., Kuzmin, I., Adler, P., Vilo, J., & Peterson, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Software Technology and Applications Competence Center (EE)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Hedi
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2023-05-05
Volume
51
Issue
W1
Pages
W207-W212
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4372332501
Cited by
1,673
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 663 · 2025: 656 · 2024: 340 · 2023: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
145.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund (2014-2020.4.01.16-0271)
  • Estonian Research Council (TT11, PRG1844)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
g:Profiler, functional enrichment, Gene Ontology, KEGG, TRANSFAC, web services, network visualization, reproducibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Genes, Humans, Software, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Internet, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review