Cited by 180Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

CASTpFold: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of the universe of protein Folds

Open access
Ye, Bowei, Tian, Wei, Wang, Boshen, Liang, Jie·2024·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Geometric and topological properties of protein structures, including surface pockets, interior cavities and cross channels, are of fundamental importance for proteins to carry out their functions. Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins (CASTp) is a widely used web server for locating, delineating, and measuring these geometric and topological properties of protein structures. Recent developments in AI-based protein structure prediction such as AlphaFold2 (AF2) have significantly expanded our knowledge on protein structures. Here we present CASTpFold, a continuation of CASTp that provides accurate and comprehensive identifications and quantifications of protein topography. It now provides (i) results on an expanded database of proteins, including the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and non-singleton representative structures of AlphaFold2 structures, covering 183 million AF2 structures; (ii) functional pockets prediction with corresponding Gene Ontology (GO) terms or Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers for AF2-predicted structures and (iii) pocket similarity search function for surface and protein–protein interface pockets. The CASTpFold web server is freely accessible at https://cfold.bme.uic.edu/castpfold/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkae415

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ye, B., Tian, W., Wang, B., & Liang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Liang, Jie
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2024-05-23
Volume
52
Issue
W1
Pages
W194-W199
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4398761928
Cited by
180
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 9
FWCI
24.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
NIH (R35GM127084)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein cavities, protein-protein interfaces, AlphaFold2, Gene Ontology, enzyme commission numbers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review