Influence of contact map topology on RNA structure prediction
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The available sequence data of RNA molecules have greatly increased in the past years. Unfortunately, while computational power is still under exponential growth, the computer prediction quality from sequence to final structure is still inferior to labour-intensive experimental work. Although a reliable end-to-end procedure has already been developed for proteins since Alphafold2, while its successor AlphaFold3 can also predict RNA, its confidence, in particular for novel sequences and folds, still appears limited. Another strategy entails two steps: (i) predicting potential contacts in the form of a contact map from evolutionary data; and (ii) simulating the molecule with a physical force field while using the contact map as restraint. However, the quality of the structure prediction crucially depends on the quality of the contact map. Until now, only the proportion of true positive contacts was considered as a quality characteristic. We propose to also include the distribution of these contacts, and have done so in our recent studies. We observed that the clustering of contacts, as is common for many artificial intelligence algorithms, has a negative impact on prediction quality. In contrast, a more distributed topology is beneficial. We have applied these findings from computer experiments to current algorithms and introduced a measure of distribution, the Gaussian score.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Evolution of multisubunit RNA polymerases in the three domains of life
Werner, F., & Grohmann, D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2507 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Martini coarse-grained force field: Extension to RNA
Uusitalo, J. J., Ingólfsson, H. I., Marrink, S. J., & Faustino, I. (2017) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.043 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Predicting RNA structures and functions by artificial intelligence.
Zhang, J., Lang, M., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Faber, C., Upadhyay, U., Taubert, O., & Schug, A.
- Affiliations
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schug, Alexander
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-11-26
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 22
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC12709182
- OpenAlex
- W4417457892
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- John von Neumann Institute for Computing
- Forschungszentrum Jülich and Helmholtz Association
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- RNA structure prediction, RNA folding, AlphaFold3
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review