Cited by 47DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be extremely short and highly directional

Open access
Palmer, S.·2003·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Gene conversion is a common outcome of double-strand break (DSB) repair in yeast. Prior studies revealed that DSB-induced gene conversion tracts are often short (<53 bp), unidirectional, and biased toward promoter-proximal (5') markers. In those studies, broken ends had short, non-homologous termini. For the present study we created plasmid x chromosome, chromosomal direct repeat and allelic recombination substrates in which donor alleles carried mutant HO sites (HOinc--not cleaved) at the same position as cleavable HO sites in recipient alleles. In these substrates, broken ends are almost completely homologous to donor alleles, differing only at the three HOinc mutations. These mutations serve as markers very close to, or within, the four-base overhang produced by HO nuclease. We identified extremely short tracts (<12 bp) and many tracts were highly directional, extending <2 bp on one side of the DSB. We thought that terminal homology would promote bidirectional tracts, but found instead that unidirectional tracts were more frequent. Interestingly, substrates with terminal homology displayed enhanced 3' conversion, and in several cases conversion bias was reversed toward 3' markers. These results are discussed in relation to factors that may influence tract length and directionality, including heteroduplex DNA formation, transcription, replication and mismatch repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkg219

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 47

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. Petes,T.D., Malone,R.E. and Symington,L.S. (1991) Broach,J.R., Pringle,J.R. and Jones,E.W. (eds), The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis and Energetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Vol. I, pp. 407±521.
  2. [47]47. Bertino,J.R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cancer, 2nd Edn. Elsevier Science, San Diego, USA. Vol. 4, pp. 49±59.

Authors
Palmer, S.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Palmer, S.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2003-02-15
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1164-1173
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W1970136416
Cited by
47
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA055302, CA 55302)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM08751, T34GM008751)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
gene conversion, DNA double-strand break repair, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, HO endonuclease, heteroduplex DNA, DNA mismatch repair, allelic recombination
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA Damage, DNA, Fungal, Gene Conversion, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Substrate Specificity, Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review