The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of different antisense strategies in mammalian cells using locked nucleic acids, 2'-O-methyl RNA, phosphorothioates and small interfering RNA
Open accessAbstract
Locked nucleic acids (LNAs) and double-stranded small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are rather new promising antisense molecules for cell culture and in vivo applications. Here, we compare LNA-DNA-LNA gapmer oligonucleotides and siRNAs with a phosphorothioate and a chimeric 2'-O-methyl RNA-DNA gapmer with respect to their capacities to knock down the expression of the vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (VR1). LNA-DNA-LNA gapmers with four or five LNAs on either side and a central stretch of 10 or 8 DNA monomers in the center were found to be active gapmers that inhibit gene expression. A comparative co-transfection study showed that siRNA is the most potent inhibitor of VR1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression. A specific inhibition was observed with an estimated IC50 of 0.06 nM. An LNA gapmer was found to be the most efficient single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide, with an IC50 of 0.4 nM being 175-fold lower than that of commonly used phosphorothioates (IC50 approximately 70 nM). In contrast, the efficiency of a 2'-O-methyl-modified oligonucleotide (IC50 approximately 220 nM) was 3-fold lower compared with the phosphorothioate. The high potency of siRNAs and chimeric LNA-DNA oligonucleotides make them valuable candidates for cell culture and in vivo applications targeting the VR1 mRNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tolerance for mutations and chemical modifications in a siRNA
Amarzguioui, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg147 · Cited by 534
Efficient Reduction of Target RNAs by Small Interfering RNA and RNase H-dependent Antisense Agents
Vickers, T. A., Koo, S., Bennett, C. F., Crooke, S. T., Dean, N. M., & Baker, B. F. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m210326200 · Cited by 461
Cited by
MicroRNA-21 Is an Antiapoptotic Factor in Human Glioblastoma Cells
Chan, J. A., Krichevsky, A. M., & Kosik, K. S. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0137 · Cited by 2,557
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
siRNA versus miRNA as therapeutics for gene silencing
Lam, J. K. W., Chow, M. Y. T., Zhang, Y., & Leung, S. W. S. (2015) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2015.23 · Cited by 1,081
LNA (Locked Nucleic Acid): High-Affinity Targeting of Complementary RNA and DNA
Vester, B., & Wengel, J. (2004) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi0485732 · Cited by 727
Progress towards in Vivo Use of siRNAs
Behlke, M. A. (2006) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.01.001 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Grunweller, A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3185-3193
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2163914444
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of different antisense strategies in mammalian cells using locked nucleic acids, 2'-O-methyl RNA, phosphorothioates and small interfering RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkg409
- The paper
- Grunweller, A. (2003). Comparison of different antisense strategies in mammalian cells using locked nucleic acids, 2'-O-methyl RNA, phosphorothioates and small interfering RNA. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.