The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decoding the genome: a modified view
Open accessAbstract
Transfer RNA's role in decoding the genome is critical to the accuracy and efficiency of protein synthesis. Though modified nucleosides were identified in RNA 50 years ago, only recently has their importance to tRNA's ability to decode cognate and wobble codons become apparent. RNA modifications are ubiquitous. To date, some 100 different posttranslational modifications have been identified. Modifications of tRNA are the most extensively investigated; however, many other RNAs have modified nucleosides. The modifications that occur at the first, or wobble position, of tRNA's anticodon and those 3'-adjacent to the anticodon are of particular interest. The tRNAs most affected by individual and combinations of modifications respond to codons in mixed codon boxes where distinction of the third codon base is important for discriminating between the correct cognate or wobble codons and the incorrect near-cognate codons (e.g. AAA/G for lysine versus AAU/C asparagine). In contrast, other modifications expand wobble codon recognition, such as U*U base pairing, for tRNAs that respond to multiple codons of a 4-fold degenerate codon box (e.g. GUU/A/C/G for valine). Whether restricting codon recognition, expanding wobble, enabling translocation, or maintaining the messenger RNA, reading frame modifications appear to reduce anticodon loop dynamics to that accepted by the ribosome. Therefore, we suggest that anticodon stem and loop domain nucleoside modifications allow a limited number of tRNAs to accurately and efficiently decode the 61 amino acid codons by selectively restricting some anticodon-codon interactions and expanding others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400 · cited 1×
“The three letter code was supported by experiments in vivo including some of the earliest applications of translational frameshifting (3).”
MethodYokoyama, S., Watanabe, T., Murao, K., Ishikura, H., Yamaizumi, Z., Nishimura, S., & Miyazawa, T. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.15.4905 · Cited by 271
The Genetic Code--Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Crick, F. H. C. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.007 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Tissue-Specific Differences in Human Transfer RNA Expression
Dittmar, K. A., Goodenbour, J. M., & Pan, T. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020221 · Cited by 601
Natural expansion of the genetic code
Ambrogelly, A., Palioura, S., & Söll, D. (2007) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio847 · Cited by 361
A critical analysis of codon optimization in human therapeutics
Mauro, V. P., & Chappell, S. A. (2014) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.09.003 · Cited by 343
Codon and amino acid content are associated with mRNA stability in mammalian cells
Forrest, M. E., Pinkard, O., Martin, S., Sweet, T. J., Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228730 · Cited by 116
Heuberger, B. D., Pal, A., Del Frate, F., Topkar, V. V., & Szostak, J. W. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b00445 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Agris, P. F.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-238
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2171496353
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decoding the genome: a modified view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkh185
- The paper
- Agris, P. F. (2004). Decoding the genome: a modified view. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.