Cited by 1,156Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for protein classification

Open access
Marchler-Bauer, A.·2004·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Conserved Domain Database (CDD) is the protein classification component of NCBI's Entrez query and retrieval system. CDD is linked to other Entrez databases such as Proteins, Taxonomy and PubMed, and can be accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=cdd. CD-Search, which is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, is a fast, interactive tool to identify conserved domains in new protein sequences. CD-Search results for protein sequences in Entrez are pre-computed to provide links between proteins and domain models, and computational annotation visible upon request. Protein-protein queries submitted to NCBI's BLAST search service at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST are scanned for the presence of conserved domains by default. While CDD started out as essentially a mirror of publicly available domain alignment collections, such as SMART, Pfam and COG, we have continued an effort to update, and in some cases replace these models with domain hierarchies curated at the NCBI. Here, we report on the progress of the curation effort and associated improvements in the functionality of the CDD information retrieval system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gki069

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The conformation of Als1 is similar to that of the pfam02368 family of bacterial immunoglobulin-like domain surface protein/adhesins, which includes the invasin of Y. pseudotuberculosis.

    “The conformation of Als1 is similar to that of the pfam02368 family of bacterial immunoglobulin-like domain surface protein/adhesins, which includes the invasin of Y. pseudotuberculosis [42,43].”

    From Als3 Is a Candida albicans Invasin That Binds to Cadherins and Induces Endocytosis by Host Cells (2007) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction discusses domain families and structural comparisons generally, but does not address Als1 or the claimed resemblance. Searches for pfam02368, invasin, and bacterial immunoglobulin-like adhesins found no passage in our copy establishing the comparison or the family's membership. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The cleft motif of Als3 is more similar to that of the COG4886 family of leucine-rich repeat invasins/intimins.

    “In contrast, the cleft motif of Als3 is more similar to that of the COG4886 family of leucine-rich repeat invasins/intimins [42].”

    From Als3 Is a Candida albicans Invasin That Binds to Cadherins and Induces Endocytosis by Host Cells (2007) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Introduction and Finding Domains in Entrez sections describe CDD and how it assesses domain-family similarity, but do not compare the Als3 cleft motif with any family. Searches for Als3, COG4886, and leucine-rich repeat invasins/intimins found no passage addressing the claimed resemblance. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Bateman A., Coin,L., Durbin,R., Finn,R.D., Hollich,V., Griffiths-Jones,S., Khanna,A., Marshall,M., Moxon,S., Sonnhammer,E.L., Studholme,D.J., Yeats,C. and Eddy,S.R. (2004) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 138– 141. PMC308855 14681378
  2. [2]Letunic I., Copley,R.R., Schmidt,S., Ciccarelli,F.D., Doerks,T., Schultz,J., Ponting,C.P. and Bork,P. (2004) SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 142– 144. PMC308822 14681379
  3. [3]Tatusov R.L., Fedorova,N.D., Jackson,J.D., Jacobs,A.R., Kiryutin,B., Koonin,E.V., Krylov,D.M., Mazumder,R., Mekhedov,S.L., Nikolskaya,A.N., Rao,B.S., Smirnov,S., Sverdlov,A.V., Vasudevan,S., Wolf,Y.I., Yin,J.J. and Natale,D.A. (2003) The COG database: and updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 41. 12969510 PMC222959
  4. [4]Marchler-Bauer A. and Bryant,S.H. (2004) CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W327– W331. 15215404 PMC441592
  5. [5]Marchler-Bauer A., Panchenko,A.R., Ariel,N. and Bryant,S.H. (2002) Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains. Proteins, 48, 439– 446. 12112669
  6. [6]Marchler-Bauer A., Panchenko,A.R., Shoemaker,B.A., Thiessen,P.A., Geer,L.Y. and Bryant,S.H. (2002) CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 281– 283. 11752315 PMC99109
  7. [7]Wheeler D.L., Church,D.M., Edgar,R., Federhen,S., Helmberg,W., Madden,T.L., Pontius,J.U., Schuler,G.D., Schriml,L.M., Sequeira,E., Suzek,T.O., Tatusova,T.A. and Wagner,L. (2004) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 35– 40. 14681353 PMC308807
  8. [8]Geer L.Y., Domrachev,M., Lipman,D.J. and Bryant,S.H. (2002) CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res., 12, 1619– 1623. 12368255 PMC187533
  9. [9]Wang Y., Geer,L.Y., Chappey,C., Kans,J.A. and Bryant,S.H. (2000) Cn3D: sequence and structure views for Entrez. Trends Biochem. Sci., 25, 300– 302. 10838572

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchler-Bauer, A.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2004-12-17
Volume
33
Issue
Database issue
Pages
D192-D196
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2133666768
Cited by
1,156
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
52.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein domain annotation, conserved domains, protein classification, domain model, domain hierarchy, database curation, Entrez, BLAST, SMART, Pfam, COG
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Phylogeny, Proteins, User-Computer Interface, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review