The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes
Open accessAbstract
The release of the 1000th complete microbial genome will occur in the next two to three years. In anticipation of this milestone, the Fellowship for Interpretation of Genomes (FIG) launched the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes. The project is built around the principle that the key to improved accuracy in high-throughput annotation technology is to have experts annotate single subsystems over the complete collection of genomes, rather than having an annotation expert attempt to annotate all of the genes in a single genome. Using the subsystems approach, all of the genes implementing the subsystem are analyzed by an expert in that subsystem. An annotation environment was created where populated subsystems are curated and projected to new genomes. A portable notion of a populated subsystem was defined, and tools developed for exchanging and curating these objects. Tools were also developed to resolve conflicts between populated subsystems. The SEED is the first annotation environment that supports this model of annotation. Here, we describe the subsystem approach, and offer the first release of our growing library of populated subsystems. The initial release of data includes 180 177 distinct proteins with 2133 distinct functional roles. This data comes from 173 subsystems and 383 different organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Cited by
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level
Jolley, K. A., & Maiden, M. C. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 · Cited by 2,368
A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction
Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 · Cited by 1,789
KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase
(2018) · doi:10.1038/nbt.4163 · Cited by 1,624
Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4
Huson, D. H., Mitra, S., Ruscheweyh, H.-J., Weber, N., & Schuster, S. C. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.120618.111 · Cited by 1,541
Metadata
- Authors
- Overbeek, R.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 5691-5702
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2114034054
- Cited by
- 2,012
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gki866
- The paper
- Overbeek, R. (2005). The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.