The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources
Open accessAbstract
MODBASE (http://salilab.org/modbase) is a database of annotated comparative protein structure models for all available protein sequences that can be matched to at least one known protein structure. The models are calculated by MODPIPE, an automated modeling pipeline that relies on MODELLER for fold assignment, sequence-structure alignment, model building and model assessment (http:/salilab.org/modeller). MODBASE is updated regularly to reflect the growth in protein sequence and structure databases, and improvements in the software for calculating the models. MODBASE currently contains 3 094 524 reliable models for domains in 1 094 750 out of 1 817 889 unique protein sequences in the UniProt database (July 5, 2005); only models based on statistically significant alignments and models assessed to have the correct fold despite insignificant alignments are included. MODBASE also allows users to generate comparative models for proteins of interest with the automated modeling server MODWEB (http://salilab.org/modweb). Our other resources integrated with MODBASE include comprehensive databases of multiple protein structure alignments (DBAli, http://salilab.org/dbali), structurally defined ligand binding sites and structurally defined binary domain interfaces (PIBASE, http://salilab.org/pibase) as well as predictions of ligand binding sites, interactions between yeast proteins, and functional consequences of human nsSNPs (LS-SNP, http://salilab.org/LS-SNP).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure-based prediction of protein–protein interactions on a genome-wide scale
Zhang, Q. C., Petrey, D., Deng, L., Qiang, L., Shi, Y., Thu, C. A., Bisikirska, B., Lefebvre, C., Accili, D., Hunter, T., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11503 · Cited by 723
Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears
Liu, S., Lorenzen, E. D., Fumagalli, M., Li, B., Harris, K., Xiong, Z., Zhou, L., Korneliussen, T. S., Somel, M., Babbitt, C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.054 · Cited by 411
Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009
Lensink, M. F., & Wodak, S. J. (2010) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22818 · Cited by 226
Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies
Alber, F., Förster, F., Korkin, D., Topf, M., & Sali, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060407.135530 · Cited by 206
structureViz: linking cytoscape and UCSF Chimera
Morris, J. H., Huang, C. C., Babbitt, P. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm329 · Cited by 82
Heimer, G., Oz-Levi, D., Eyal, E., Edvardson, S., Nissenkorn, A., Ruzzo, E. K., Szeinberg, A., Maayan, C., Mai-Zahav, M., Efrati, O., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Paediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.10.003 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Pieper, U.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 90001
- Pages
- D291-D295
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W4230842383
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.