The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations
Open accessAbstract
Unified, structured vocabularies and classifications freely provided by the Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium are widely accepted in most of the large scale gene annotation projects. Consequently, many tools have been created for use with the GO ontologies. WEGO (Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plot) is a simple but useful tool for visualizing, comparing and plotting GO annotation results. Different from other commercial software for creating chart, WEGO is designed to deal with the directed acyclic graph structure of GO to facilitate histogram creation of GO annotation results. WEGO has been used widely in many important biological research projects, such as the rice genome project and the silkworm genome project. It has become one of the daily tools for downstream gene annotation analysis, especially when performing comparative genomics tasks. WEGO, along with the two other tools, namely External to GO Query and GO Archive Query, are freely available for all users at http://wego.genomics.org.cn. There are two available mirror sites at http://wego2.genomics.org.cn and http://wego.genomics.com.cn. Any suggestions are welcome at wego@genomics.org.cn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Boyle, E. I., Weng, S., Gollub, J., Jin, H., Botstein, D., Cherry, J. M., & Sherlock, G. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth456 · Cited by 2,067
Cited by
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108
Wang, Z., Fang, B., Chen, J., Zhang, X., Luo, Z., Huang, L., Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-726 · Cited by 433
Self-citationComparative Genome Sequence Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Adams, M. D., Goglin, K., Molyneaux, N., Hujer, K. M., Lavender, H., Jamison, J. J., MacDonald, I. J., Martin, K. M., Russo, T., Campagnari, A. A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00834-08 · Cited by 435
Jex, A. R., Liu, S., Li, B., Young, N. D., Hall, R. S., Li, Y., Yang, L., Zeng, N., Xu, X., Xiong, Z., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10553 · Cited by 276
Self-citationTao, X., Gu, Y.-H., Wang, H.-Y., Zheng, W., Li, X., Zhao, C.-W., & Zhang, Y.-Z. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036234 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, J., Fang, L., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Li, S., Li, R., Bolund, L., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- Web Server
- Pages
- W293-W297
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2165463056
- Cited by
- 2,684
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkl031
- The paper
- Ye, J., Fang, L., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Li, S., Li, R., Bolund, L., & Wang, J. (2006). WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
