Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 483

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases

Open access
Caspi, Ron, Altman, Tomer, Dale, Joseph M., Dreher, Kate, Fulcher, Carol A., Gilham, Fred, Kaipa, Pallavi, Karthikeyan, Athikkattuvalasu S., Kothari, Anamika, Krummenacker, Markus, Latendresse, Mario, Mueller, Lukas A., Paley, Suzanne, Popescu, Liviu, Pujar, Anuradha, Shearer, Alexander G., Zhang, Peifen, Karp, Peter D.·2010·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The MetaCyc database (MetaCyc.org) is a comprehensive and freely accessible resource for metabolic pathways and enzymes from all domains of life. The pathways in MetaCyc are experimentally determined, small-molecule metabolic pathways and are curated from the primary scientific literature. With more than 1400 pathways, MetaCyc is the largest collection of metabolic pathways currently available. Pathways reactions are linked to one or more well-characterized enzymes, and both pathways and enzymes are annotated with reviews, evidence codes, and literature citations. BioCyc (BioCyc.org) is a collection of more than 500 organism-specific Pathway/Genome Databases (PGDBs). Each BioCyc PGDB contains the full genome and predicted metabolic network of one organism. The network, which is predicted by the Pathway Tools software using MetaCyc as a reference, consists of metabolites, enzymes, reactions and metabolic pathways. BioCyc PGDBs also contain additional features, such as predicted operons, transport systems, and pathway hole-fillers. The BioCyc Web site offers several tools for the analysis of the PGDBs, including Omics Viewers that enable visualization of omics datasets on two different genome-scale diagrams and tools for comparative analysis. The BioCyc PGDBs generated by SRI are offered for adoption by any party interested in curation of metabolic, regulatory, and genome-related information about an organism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkp875

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 483

Metadata

Authors
Caspi, R., Altman, T., Dale, J. M., Dreher, K., Fulcher, C. A., Gilham, F., Kaipa, P., Karthikeyan, A. S., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., Paley, S., Popescu, L., Pujar, A., Shearer, A. G., Zhang, P., & Karp, P. D.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
38
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
D473-D479
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4233060585
Cited by
483
References
2
FWCI
25.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkp875
The paper
Caspi, R., Altman, T., Dale, J. M., Dreher, K., Fulcher, C. A., Gilham, F., Kaipa, P., Karthikeyan, A. S., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., Paley, S., Popescu, L., Pujar, A., Shearer, A. G., Zhang, P., & Karp, P. D. (2010). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp875

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.