The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges
Open accessAbstract
Orthologous relationships form the basis of most comparative genomic and metagenomic studies and are essential for proper phylogenetic and functional analyses. The third version of the eggNOG database (http://eggnog.embl.de) contains non-supervised orthologous groups constructed from 1133 organisms, doubling the number of genes with orthology assignment compared to eggNOG v2. The new release is the result of a number of improvements and expansions: (i) the underlying homology searches are now based on the SIMAP database; (ii) the orthologous groups have been extended to 41 levels of selected taxonomic ranges enabling much more fine-grained orthology assignments; and (iii) the newly designed web page is considerably faster with more functionality. In total, eggNOG v3 contains 721,801 orthologous groups, encompassing a total of 4,396,591 genes. Additionally, we updated 4873 and 4850 original COGs and KOGs, respectively, to include all 1133 organisms. At the universal level, covering all three domains of life, 101,208 orthologous groups are available, while the others are applicable at 40 more limited taxonomic ranges. Each group is amended by multiple sequence alignments and maximum-likelihood trees and broad functional descriptions are provided for 450,904 orthologous groups (62.5%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663
Self-citationRuan, J., Li, H., Chen, Z., Coghlan, A., Coin, L. J. M., Guo, Y., Heriche, J.-K., Hu, Y., Kristiansen, K., Li, R., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm1005 · Cited by 332
OMA 2011: orthology inference among 1000 complete genomes
Altenhoff, A. M., Schneider, A., Gonnet, G. H., & Dessimoz, C. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1238 · Cited by 215
OrthoInspector: comprehensive orthology analysis and visual exploration
Linard, B., Thompson, J. D., Poch, O., & Lecompte, O. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-11 · Cited by 64
Cited by
STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration
Franceschini, A., Szklarczyk, D., Frankild, S., Kuhn, M., Simonovic, M., Roth, A., Lin, J., Minguez, P., Bork, P., von Mering, C., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1094 · Cited by 4,398
Self-citationAn integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome
MetaHIT Consortium, Li, J., Jia, H., Cai, X., Zhong, H., Feng, Q., Sunagawa, S., Arumugam, M., Kultima, J. R., Prifti, E., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2942 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citationAlterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis
Qin, N., Yang, F., Li, A., Prifti, E., Chen, Y., Shao, L., Guo, J., Le Chatelier, E., Yao, J., Wu, L., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13568 · Cited by 2,177
Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota
MetaHIT consortium, Forslund, K., Hildebrand, F., Nielsen, T., Falony, G., Le Chatelier, E., Sunagawa, S., Prifti, E., Vieira-Silva, S., Gudmundsdottir, V., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15766 · Cited by 2,116
Self-citationThe neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression
Valles-Colomer, M., Falony, G., Darzi, Y., Tigchelaar, E. F., Wang, J., Tito, R. Y., Schiweck, C., Kurilshikov, A., Joossens, M., Wijmenga, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0337-x · Cited by 1,963
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, S., Szklarczyk, D., Trachana, K., Roth, A., Kuhn, M., Muller, J., Arnold, R., Rattei, T., Letunic, I., Doerks, T., Jensen, L. J., von Mering, C., & Bork, P.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-16
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D284-D289
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2097485877
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkr1060
- The paper
- Powell, S., Szklarczyk, D., Trachana, K., Roth, A., Kuhn, M., Muller, J., Arnold, R., Rattei, T., Letunic, I., Doerks, T., Jensen, L. J., von Mering, C., & Bork, P. (2012). eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
