The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RNA snap ™: a rapid, quantitative and inexpensive, method for isolating total RNA from bacteria
Open accessAbstract
RNAsnap™ is a simple and novel method that recovers all intracellular RNA quantitatively (>99%), faster (<15 min) and less expensively (∼3 cents/sample) than any of the currently available RNA isolation methods. In fact, none of the bacterial RNA isolation methods, including the commercial kits, are effective in recovering all species of intracellular RNAs (76-5700 nt) with equal efficiency, which can lead to biased results in genome-wide studies involving microarray or RNAseq analysis. The RNAsnap™ procedure yields ∼60 µg of RNA from 10(8) Escherichia coli cells that can be used directly for northern analysis without any further purification. Based on a comparative analysis of specific transcripts ranging in size from 76 to 5700 nt, the RNAsnap™ method provided the most accurate measure of the relative amounts of the various intracellular RNAs. Furthermore, the RNAsnap™ RNA was successfully used in enzymatic reactions such as RNA ligation, reverse transcription, primer extension and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, following sodium acetate/ethanol precipitation. The RNAsnap™ method can be used to isolate RNA from a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as well as yeast.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche
Li, H., Limenitakis, J. P., Fuhrer, T., Geuking, M. B., Lawson, M. A., Wyss, M., Brugiroux, S., Keller, I., Macpherson, J. A., Rupp, S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9292 · Cited by 511
Moore, M. J., Scheel, T. K. H., Luna, J. M., Park, C. Y., Fak, J. J., Nishiuchi, E., Rice, C. M., & Darnell, R. B. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9864 · Cited by 326
Viroid-like colonists of human microbiomes
Zheludev, I. N., Edgar, R. C., Lopez-Galiano, M. J., de la Peña, M., Babaian, A., Bhatt, A. S., & Fire, A. Z. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.033 · Cited by 73
Viroid-like colonists of human microbiomes
Zheludev, I. N., Edgar, R. C., Lopez-Galiano, M. J., de la Peña, M., Babaian, A., Bhatt, A. S., & Fire, A. Z. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.20.576352 · Cited by 73
Ricaurte, D., Huang, Y., Sheth, R. U., Gelsinger, D. R., Kaufman, A., & Wang, H. H. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01581-x · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Stead, M. B., Agrawal, A., Bowden, K. E., Nasir, R., Mohanty, B. K., Meagher, R. B., & Kushner, S. R.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- e156-e156
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1969347158
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RNA snap ™: a rapid, quantitative and inexpensive, method for isolating total RNA from bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gks680
- The paper
- Stead, M. B., Agrawal, A., Bowden, K. E., Nasir, R., Mohanty, B. K., Meagher, R. B., & Kushner, S. R. (2012). RNA snap ™: a rapid, quantitative and inexpensive, method for isolating total RNA from bacteria. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.