Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,433

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database

Open access
Marchler-Bauer, Aron, Derbyshire, Myra K., Gonzales, Noreen R., Lu, Shennan, Chitsaz, Farideh, Geer, Lewis Y., Geer, Renata C., He, Jane, Gwadz, Marc, Hurwitz, David I., Lanczycki, Christopher J., Lu, Fu, Marchler, Gabriele H., Song, James S., Thanki, Narmada, Wang, Zhouxi, Yamashita, Roxanne A., Zhang, Dachuan, Zheng, Chanjuan, Bryant, Stephen H.·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

NCBI's CDD, the Conserved Domain Database, enters its 15(th) year as a public resource for the annotation of proteins with the location of conserved domain footprints. Going forward, we strive to improve the coverage and consistency of domain annotation provided by CDD. We maintain a live search system as well as an archive of pre-computed domain annotation for sequences tracked in NCBI's Entrez protein database, which can be retrieved for single sequences or in bulk. We also maintain import procedures so that CDD contains domain models and domain definitions provided by several collections available in the public domain, as well as those produced by an in-house curation effort. The curation effort aims at increasing coverage and providing finer-grained classifications of common protein domains, for which a wealth of functional and structural data has become available. CDD curation generates alignment models of representative sequence fragments, which are in agreement with domain boundaries as observed in protein 3D structure, and which model the structurally conserved cores of domain families as well as annotate conserved features. CDD can be accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku1221

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Finn, 2014, Pfam: the protein families database, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D222, 10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Letunic, 2014, SMART: recent updates, new developments, and status in 2015, Nucleic Acids Res.
  3. Tatusov, 2001, The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 22, 10.1093/nar/29.1.22 · DOI
  4. Haft, 2013, TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D387, 10.1093/nar/gks1234 · DOI
  5. Klimke, 2009, The National Center for Biotechnology Information's Protein Clusters Database, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D216, 10.1093/nar/gkn734 · DOI
  6. Marchler-Bauer, 2003, CDD: a curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, D383, 10.1093/nar/gkg087 · DOI
  7. Schäffer, 2001, Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 2994, 10.1093/nar/29.14.2994 · DOI
  8. Marchler-Bauer, 2005, CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W327, 10.1093/nar/gkh454 · DOI
  9. Geer, 2002, CDART: protein homology by domain architecture, Genome Res., 12, 1619, 10.1101/gr.278202 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gray, 2009, Novel beta-propeller of the BTB-Kelch protein Krp1 provides a binding site for Lasp-1 that is necessary for pseudopodial extension, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 30489, 10.1074/jbc.M109.023259 · DOI
  11. Madej, 2014, MMDB and VAST+: tracking structural similarities between macromolecular complexes, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D297, 10.1093/nar/gkt1208 · DOI
  12. Derbyshire, 2012, Annotation of functional sites with the Conserved Domain Database, Database, 10.1093/database/bar058 · DOI

Cited by

See all 3,433

Metadata

Authors
Marchler-Bauer, A., Derbyshire, M. K., Gonzales, N. R., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Geer, L. Y., Geer, R. C., He, J., Gwadz, M., Hurwitz, D. I., Lanczycki, C. J., Lu, F., Marchler, G. H., Song, J. S., Thanki, N., Wang, Z., Yamashita, R. A., Zhang, D., Zheng, C., & Bryant, S. H.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-11-20
Volume
43
Issue
D1
Pages
D222-D226
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2153544371
Cited by
3,433
References
1
FWCI
134.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.