The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PASTA 2.0: an improved server for protein aggregation prediction
Open accessAbstract
The formation of amyloid aggregates upon protein misfolding is related to several devastating degenerative diseases. The propensities of different protein sequences to aggregate into amyloids, how they are enhanced by pathogenic mutations, the presence of aggregation hot spots stabilizing pathological interactions, the establishing of cross-amyloid interactions between co-aggregating proteins, all rely at the molecular level on the stability of the amyloid cross-beta structure. Our redesigned server, PASTA 2.0, provides a versatile platform where all of these different features can be easily predicted on a genomic scale given input sequences. The server provides other pieces of information, such as intrinsic disorder and secondary structure predictions, that complement the aggregation data. The PASTA 2.0 energy function evaluates the stability of putative cross-beta pairings between different sequence stretches. It was re-derived on a larger dataset of globular protein domains. The resulting algorithm was benchmarked on comprehensive peptide and protein test sets, leading to improved, state-of-the-art results with more amyloid forming regions correctly detected at high specificity. The PASTA 2.0 server can be accessed at http://protein.bio.unipd.it/pasta2/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
The prion hypothesis: from biological anomaly to basic regulatory mechanism
Tuite, M. F., & Serio, T. R. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3007 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Besingi, R. N., Wenderska, I. B., Senadheera, D. B., Cvitkovitch, D. G., Long, J. R., Wen, Z. T., & Brady, L. J. (2017) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.000443 · Cited by 99
Production and characterization of amaranth amyloid fibrils from food protein waste
Mykolenko, S., Soon, W. L., & Mezzenga, R. (2024) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109604 · Cited by 60
VIPdb, a genetic variant impact predictor database
Hu, Z., Yu, C., Furutsuki, M., Andreoletti, G., Ly, M., Hoskins, R., Adhikari, A. N., & Brenner, S. E. (2019) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23858 · Cited by 37
Cysteine oxidation triggers amyloid fibril formation of the tumor suppressor p16INK4A
Göbl, C., Morris, V. K., van Dam, L., Visscher, M., Polderman, P. E., Hartlmüller, C., de Ruiter, H., Hora, M., Liesinger, L., Birner-Gruenberger, R., et al. (2020) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2019.101316 · Cited by 29
Casola, C. (2018) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evy231 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, I., Seno, F., Tosatto, S. C. E., & Trovato, A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W301-W307
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2080831965
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.