The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences
Open accessAbstract
Increased sequencing of microbial genomes has revealed that prevailing prokaryotic species assignments can be inconsistent with whole genome information for a significant number of species. The long-standing need for a systematic and scalable species assignment technique can be met by the genome-wide Average Nucleotide Identity (gANI) metric, which is widely acknowledged as a robust measure of genomic relatedness. In this work, we demonstrate that the combination of gANI and the alignment fraction (AF) between two genomes accurately reflects their genomic relatedness. We introduce an efficient implementation of AF,gANI and discuss its successful application to 86.5M genome pairs between 13,151 prokaryotic genomes assigned to 3032 species. Subsequently, by comparing the genome clusters obtained from complete linkage clustering of these pairs to existing taxonomy, we observed that nearly 18% of all prokaryotic species suffer from anomalies in species definition. Our results can be used to explore central questions such as whether microorganisms form a continuum of genetic diversity or distinct species represented by distinct genetic signatures. We propose that this precise and objective AF,gANI-based species definition: the MiSI (Microbial Species Identifier) method, be used to address previous inconsistencies in species classification and as the primary guide for new taxonomic species assignment, supplemented by the traditional polyphasic approach, as required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Cited by
High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., & Aluru, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 · Cited by 5,748
Self-citationTYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., & Göker, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 · Cited by 3,276
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B., & Banfield, J. F. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.126 · Cited by 3,031
Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life
Parks, D. H., Rinke, C., Chuvochina, M., Chaumeil, P.-A., Woodcroft, B. J., Evans, P. N., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7 · Cited by 1,882
A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea
Parks, D. H., Chuvochina, M., Chaumeil, P.-A., Rinke, C., Mussig, A. J., & Hugenholtz, P. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8 · Cited by 1,530
Metadata
- Authors
- Varghese, N. J., Mukherjee, S., Ivanova, N., Konstantinidis, K. T., Mavrommatis, K., Kyrpides, N. C., & Pati, A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6761-6771
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1661708608
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkv657
- The paper
- Varghese, N. J., Mukherjee, S., Ivanova, N., Konstantinidis, K. T., Mavrommatis, K., Kyrpides, N. C., & Pati, A. (2015). Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.