The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of differentially methylated regions from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data without replicates
Open accessAbstract
DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification involved in many biological processes and diseases. Recent developments in whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) technology have enabled genome-wide measurements of DNA methylation at single base pair resolution. Many experiments have been conducted to compare DNA methylation profiles under different biological contexts, with the goal of identifying differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Due to the high cost of WGBS experiments, many studies are still conducted without biological replicates. Methods and tools available for analyzing such data are very limited.We develop a statistical method, DSS-single, for detecting DMRs from WGBS data without replicates. We characterize the count data using a rigorous model that accounts for the spatial correlation of methylation levels, sequence depth and biological variation. We demonstrate that using information from neighboring CG sites, biological variation can be estimated accurately even without replicates. DMR detection is then carried out via a Wald test procedure. Simulations demonstrate that DSS-single has greater sensitivity and accuracy than existing methods, and an analysis of H1 versus IMR90 cell lines suggests that it also yields the most biologically meaningful results. DSS-single is implemented in the Bioconductor package DSS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution
Houseman, E. A., Accomando, W. P., Koestler, D. C., Christensen, B. C., Marsit, C. J., Nelson, H. H., Wiencke, J. K., & Kelsey, K. T. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-86 · Cited by 3,175
The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome
Thurman, R. E., Rynes, E., Humbert, R., Vierstra, J., Maurano, M. T., Haugen, E., Sheffield, N. C., Stergachis, A. B., Wang, H., Vernot, B., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11232 · Cited by 2,679
Function and information content of DNA methylation
Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14192 · Cited by 2,060
The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium
Bernstein, B. E., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Costello, J. F., Ren, B., Milosavljevic, A., Meissner, A., Kellis, M., Marra, M. A., Beaudet, A. L., Ecker, J. R., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1010-1045 · Cited by 1,892
DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions
Stadler, M. B., Murr, R., Burger, L., Ivanek, R., Lienert, F., Schöler, A., Nimwegen, E. V., Wirbelauer, C., Oakeley, E. J., Gaidatzis, D., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10716 · Cited by 1,383
Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance
Robinson, M. D., & Smyth, G. K. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm453 · Cited by 856
Xie, W., Barr, C. L., Kim, A., Yue, F., Lee, A. Y., Eubanks, J., Dempster, E. L., & Ren, B. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.035 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding specificities of human transcription factors
Yin, Y., Morgunova, E., Jolma, A., Kaasinen, E., Sahu, B., Khund-Sayeed, S., Das, P. K., Kivioja, T., Dave, K., Zhong, F., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj2239 · Cited by 1,257
De Novo Epigenetic Programs Inhibit PD-1 Blockade-Mediated T Cell Rejuvenation
Ghoneim, H. E., Fan, Y., Moustaki, A., Abdelsamed, H. A., Dash, P., Dogra, P., Carter, R., Awad, W., Neale, G., Thomas, P. G., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.007 · Cited by 781
Effector CD8 T cells dedifferentiate into long-lived memory cells
Youngblood, B., Hale, J. S., Kissick, H. T., Ahn, E., Xu, X., Wieland, A., Araki, K., West, E. E., Ghoneim, H. E., Fan, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25144 · Cited by 471
Deleting DNMT3A in CAR T cells prevents exhaustion and enhances antitumor activity
Prinzing, B., Zebley, C. C., Petersen, C. T., Fan, Y., Anido, A. A., Yi, Z., Nguyen, P., Houke, H., Bell, M., Haydar, D., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abh0272 · Cited by 349
Epigenetic restriction of extraembryonic lineages mirrors the somatic transition to cancer
Smith, Z. D., Shi, J., Gu, H., Donaghey, J., Clement, K., Cacchiarelli, D., Gnirke, A., Michor, F., & Meissner, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23891 · Cited by 201
Pan, W.-H., Sommer, F., Falk-Paulsen, M., Ulas, T., Best, L., Fazio, A., Kachroo, P., Luzius, A., Jentzsch, M., Rehman, A., et al. (2018) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-018-0534-5 · Cited by 157
Abdelsamed, H. A., Zebley, C. C., Nguyen, H., Rutishauser, R. L., Fan, Y., Ghoneim, H. E., Crawford, J. C., Alfei, F., Alli, S., Ribeiro, S. P., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0633-5 · Cited by 121
Impact of constitutional TET2 haploinsufficiency on molecular and clinical phenotype in humans
Kaasinen, E., Kuismin, O., Rajamäki, K., Ristolainen, H., Aavikko, M., Kondelin, J., Saarinen, S., Berta, D. G., Katainen, R., Hirvonen, E. A. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09198-7 · Cited by 92
LaFlamme, C. W., Rastin, C., Sengupta, S., Pennington, H. E., Russ-Hall, S. J., Schneider, A. L., Bonkowski, E. S., Almanza Fuerte, E. P., Allan, T. J., Zalusky, M. P.-G., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50159-6 · Cited by 31
Alisch, R. S., Van Hulle, C., Chopra, P., Bhattacharyya, A., Zhang, S.-C., Davidson, R. J., Kalin, N. H., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0047-9 · Cited by 25
Wang, Z., Li, Z., Wu, D., Tian, Q., Su, S., Cheng, C., Nie, J., Yuan, Y., Wang, Y., & Xu, X. (2023) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.16153 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, H., Xu, T., Feng, H., Chen, L., Li, B., Yao, B., Qin, Z., Jin, P., & Conneely, K. N.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- gkv715
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1678624296
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
