Cited by 36Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Genome properties in 2019: a new companion database to InterPro for the inference of complete functional attributes

Open access
Richardson, Lorna J, Rawlings, Neil D, Salazar, Gustavo A, Almeida, Alexandre, Haft, David R, Ducq, Gregory, Sutton, Granger G, Finn, Robert D·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Automatic annotation of protein function is routinely applied to newly sequenced genomes. While this provides a fine-grained view of an organism's functional protein repertoire, proteins, more commonly function in a coordinated manner, such as in pathways or multimeric complexes. Genome Properties (GPs) define such functional entities as a series of steps, originally described by either TIGRFAMs or Pfam entries. To increase the scope of coverage, we have migrated GPs to function as a companion resource utilizing InterPro entries. Having introduced GPs-specific versioned releases, we provide software and data via a GitHub repository, and have developed a new web interface to GPs (available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/genomeproperties). In addition to exploring each of the 1286 GPs, the website contains GPs pre-calculated for a representative set of proteomes; these results can be used to profile GPs phylogenetically via an interactive viewer. Users can upload novel data to the viewer for comparison with the pre-calculated results. Over the last year, we have added ∼700 new GPs, increasing the coverage of eukaryotic systems, as well as increasing general coverage through automatic generation of GPs from related resources. All data are freely available via the website and the GitHub repository.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gky1013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MGnify's latest update v5.0, released September 2019, extends analyses further, substantially increasing the scope of functional annotations through the addition of KEGG orthologue predictions for reads and assembled contigs, and KEGG pathways and Genome Properties annotations for assembled contigs.

    “The latest update (v5.0), released September 2019, extends the analyses further, substantially increasing the scope of functional annotations through the addition of KEGG (23) orthologue predictions for reads and assembled contigs, and KEGG pathways and Genome Properties (24) annotations for assembled contigs.”

    From MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020 (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 36

Authors
Richardson, L. J., Rawlings, N. D., Salazar, G. A., Almeida, A., Haft, D. R., Ducq, G., Sutton, G. G., & Finn, R. D.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Finn, Robert D
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2018-10-26
Volume
47
Issue
D1
Pages
D564-D572
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2898548494
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1458808)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N00521X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
InterPro, protein annotation, protein pathways, Pfam, phylogenetic profiling, eukaryotic proteomes, online databases
MeSH terms
Proteins, Genome, Proteome, Databases, Protein, Multiprotein Complexes, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genome, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review