The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BeStSel: a web server for accurate protein secondary structure prediction and fold recognition from the circular dichroism spectra
Open accessAbstract
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a widely used method to study the protein secondary structure. However, for decades, the general opinion was that the correct estimation of β-sheet content is challenging because of the large spectral and structural diversity of β-sheets. Recently, we showed that the orientation and twisting of β-sheets account for the observed spectral diversity, and developed a new method to estimate accurately the secondary structure (PNAS, 112, E3095). BeStSel web server provides the Beta Structure Selection method to analyze the CD spectra recorded by conventional or synchrotron radiation CD equipment. Both normalized and measured data can be uploaded to the server either as a single spectrum or series of spectra. The originality of BeStSel is that it carries out a detailed secondary structure analysis providing information on eight secondary structure components including parallel-β structure and antiparallel β-sheets with three different groups of twist. Based on these, it predicts the protein fold down to the topology/homology level of the CATH protein fold classification. The server also provides a module to analyze the structures deposited in the PDB for BeStSel secondary structure contents in relation to Dictionary of Secondary Structure of Proteins data. The BeStSel server is freely accessible at http://bestsel.elte.hu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Miles, A. J., Ramalli, S. G., & Wallace, B. A. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4153 · Cited by 478
Shen, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106686 · Cited by 164
Liquid–liquid phase separation underpins the formation of replication factories in rotaviruses
Geiger, F., Acker, J., Papa, G., Wang, X., Arter, W. E., Saar, K. L., Erkamp, N. A., Qi, R., Bravo, J. P., Strauss, S., et al. (2021) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2021107711 · Cited by 130
Asgard archaea shed light on the evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic ubiquitin-ESCRT machinery
Hatano, T., Palani, S., Papatziamou, D., Salzer, R., Souza, D. P., Tamarit, D., Makwana, M., Potter, A., Haig, A., Xu, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30656-2 · Cited by 104
ProteinSGM: Score-based generative modeling for de novo protein design
Lee, J. S., Kim, J., & Kim, P. M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.13.499967 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Micsonai, A., Wien, F., Bulyáki, É., Kun, J., Moussong, É., Lee, Y.-H., Goto, Y., Réfrégiers, M., & Kardos, J.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-06-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W315-W322
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2808618567
- Cited by
- 1,131
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BeStSel: a web server for accurate protein secondary structure prediction and fold recognition from the circular dichroism spectra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gky497
- The paper
- Micsonai, A., Wien, F., Bulyáki, É., Kun, J., Moussong, É., Lee, Y.-H., Goto, Y., Réfrégiers, M., & Kardos, J. (2018). BeStSel: a web server for accurate protein secondary structure prediction and fold recognition from the circular dichroism spectra. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.