The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SwissTargetPrediction: updated data and new features for efficient prediction of protein targets of small molecules
Open accessAbstract
SwissTargetPrediction is a web tool, on-line since 2014, that aims to predict the most probable protein targets of small molecules. Predictions are based on the similarity principle, through reverse screening. Here, we describe the 2019 version, which represents a major update in terms of underlying data, backend and web interface. The bioactivity data were updated, the model retrained and similarity thresholds redefined. In the new version, the predictions are performed by searching for similar molecules, in 2D and 3D, within a larger collection of 376 342 compounds known to be experimentally active on an extended set of 3068 macromolecular targets. An efficient backend implementation allows to speed up the process that returns results for a druglike molecule on human proteins in 15–20 s. The refreshed web interface enhances user experience with new features for easy input and improved analysis. Interoperability capacity enables straightforward submission of any input or output molecule to other on-line computer-aided drug design tools, developed by the SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. High levels of predictive performance were maintained despite more extended biological and chemical spaces to be explored, e.g. achieving at least one correct human target in the top 15 predictions for >70% of external compounds. The new SwissTargetPrediction is available free of charge (www.swisstargetprediction.ch).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
Self-citation
Cited by
Exploration of databases and methods supporting drug repurposing: a comprehensive survey
Tanoli, Z., Seemab, U., Scherer, A., Wennerberg, K., Tang, J., & Vähä-Koskela, M. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa003 · Cited by 131
The machine learning life cycle and the cloud: implications for drug discovery
Spjuth, O., Frid, J., & Hellander, A. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2021.1932812 · Cited by 67
Elsallabi, O., Patruno, A., Pesce, M., Cataldi, A., Carradori, S., & Gallorini, M. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27030738 · Cited by 67
De Lellis, L., Veschi, S., Tinari, N., Mokini, Z., Carradori, S., Brocco, D., Florio, R., Grassadonia, A., & Cama, A. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13163946 · Cited by 40
Wang, X.-P., Xie, W.-P., Bi, Y.-F., Wang, B.-A., Song, H.-B., Wang, S.-L., & Bi, R.-X. (2021) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2021.9899 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W357-W364
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2946412700
- Cited by
- 4,534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 169.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.