The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications
Open accessAbstract
The detection of double-stranded (ds) DNA by SYBR Green I (SG) is important in many molecular biology methods including gel electrophoresis, dsDNA quantification in solution and real-time PCR. Biophysical studies at defined dye/base pair ratios (dbprs) were used to determine the structure-property relationships that affect methods applying SG. These studies revealed the occurrence of intercalation, followed by surface binding at dbprs above approximately 0.15. Only the latter led to a significant increase in fluorescence. Studies with poly(dA)* poly(dT) and poly(dG)* poly(dC) homopolymers showed sequence-specific binding of SG. Also, salts had a marked impact on SG fluorescence. We also noted binding of SG to single-stranded (ss) DNA, although SG/ssDNA fluorescence was at least approximately 11-fold lower than with dsDNA. To perform these studies, we determined the structure of SG by mass spectrometry and NMR analysis to be [2-[N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-propylamino]-4-[2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-(benzo-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-methylidene]-1-phenyl-quinolinium]. For comparison, the structure of PicoGreen (PG) was also determined and is [2-[N-bis-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-amino]-4-[2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-(benzo-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-methylidene]-1-phenyl-quinolinium]+. These structure-property relationships help in the design of methods that use SG, in particular dsDNA quantification in solution and real-time PCR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data
Ruijter, J. M., Ramakers, C., Hoogaars, W. M. H., Karlen, Y., Bakker, O., van den Hoff, M. J. B., & Moorman, A. F. M. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp045 · Cited by 3,043
The real-time polymerase chain reaction
Kubista, M., Andrade, J. M., Bengtsson, M., Forootan, A., Jonák, J., Lind, K., Sindelka, R., Sjöback, R., Sjögreen, B., Strömbom, L., et al. (2006) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007 · Cited by 1,515
Twenty-Five Years of Quantitative PCR for Gene Expression Analysis
VanGuilder, H. D., Vrana, K. E., & Freeman, W. M. (2008) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112776 · Cited by 1,246
Xenobiotics shape the physiology and gene expression of the active human gut microbiome
Maurice, C. F., Haiser, H. J., & Turnbaugh, P. J. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.052 · Cited by 811
Kurihara, K., Tamura, M., Shohda, K.-I., Toyota, T., Suzuki, K., & Sugawara, T. (2011) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1127 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Zipper, H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e103-e103
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2156896172
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gnh101
- The paper
- Zipper, H. (2004). Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gnh101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.