The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NucleoSeeker—precision filtering of RNA databases to curate high-quality datasets
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The structural prediction of biomolecules via computational methods complements the often involved wet-lab experiments. Unlike protein structure prediction, RNA structure prediction remains a significant challenge in bioinformatics, primarily due to the scarcity of annotated RNA structure data and its varying quality. Many methods have used this limited data to train deep learning models but redundancy, data leakage and bad data quality hampers their performance. In this work, we present NucleoSeeker, a tool designed to curate high-quality, tailored datasets from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database. It is a unified framework that combines multiple tools and streamlines an otherwise complicated process of data curation. It offers multiple filters at structure, sequence, and annotation levels, giving researchers full control over data curation. Further, we present several use cases. In particular, we demonstrate how NucleoSeeker allows the creation of a nonredundant RNA structure dataset to assess AlphaFold3’s performance for RNA structure prediction. This demonstrates NucleoSeeker’s effectiveness in curating valuable nonredundant tailored datasets to both train novel and judge existing methods. NucleoSeeker is very easy to use, highly flexible, and can significantly increase the quality of RNA structure datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Weigt, 2009, Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 106, 67, 10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · DOI · Paper page
- Schug, 2009, High-resolution protein complexes from integrating genomic information with molecular simulation, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 106, 22124, 10.1073/pnas.0912100106 · DOI
- De, 2015, Direct-coupling analysis of nucleotide coevolution facilitates RNA secondary and tertiary structure prediction, Nucleic Acids Res, 43, 10444
- Pucci, 2019, Shedding light on the dark matter of the biomolecular structural universe: progress in RNA 3D structure prediction, 68, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.012 · DOI
- Berman, 2000, The protein data bank, Nucleic Acids Res, 28, 235, 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- de Hond, 2022, Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review, NPJ Dig Med, 5, 2, 10.1038/s41746-021-00549-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Apicella, Don’t push the button! exploring data leakage risks in machine learning and transfer learning, 10.2139/ssrn.4733889 · DOI
- Cruz, 2012, RNA-Puzzles: a CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction, RNA, 18, 610, 10.1261/rna.031054.111 · DOI
- Das, 2023, Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15, Proteins, 91, 1747, 10.1002/prot.26602 · DOI · Paper page
- Pucci, 2020, Evaluating DCA-based method performances for RNA contact prediction by a well-curated data set, RNA, 26, 794, 10.1261/rna.073809.119 · DOI
- Adamczyk, 2022, RNAsolo: a repository of cleaned PDB-derived RNA 3D structures, Bioinformatics, 38, 3668, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac386 · DOI
- Nawrocki, 2013, Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches, Bioinformatics, 29, 2933, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 · DOI
- Kalvari, 2021, Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D192, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1047 · DOI
- Sievers, 2011, Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega, Mol Syst Biol, 7, 539, 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
- Rice, 2000, EMBOSS: the european molecular biology open software suite, Trends Genet, 16, 276, 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Zerihun, 2020, Pydca v1.0: a comprehensive software for direct coupling analysis of RNA and protein sequences, Bioinformatics, 36, 2264, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz892 · DOI
- Taubert, 2023, RNA contact prediction by data efficient deep learning, Commun Biol, 6, 1, 10.1038/s42003-023-05244-9 · DOI · Paper page
- JSC, 2021, JUWELS cluster and booster: exascale pathfinder with modular supercomputing architecture at juelich supercomputing centre, J Large-scale Res Facil, 7, A138, 10.17815/jlsrf-7-183 · DOI
- JSC, 2021, JURECA: data centric and booster modules implementing the modular supercomputing architecture at Jülich supercomputing centre, J Large-Scale Res Facil, 7, 10.17815/jlsrf-7-182 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Upadhyay, U., Pucci, F., Herold, J., & Schug, A.
- Affiliations
- John von Neumann Institute for Computing (DE)
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schug, Alexander
- Venue
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-01-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- lqaf021-lqaf021
- ISSN
- 2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11915511
- OpenAlex
- W4408545910
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- JuSER Publikationsportal
- Funders
- NIC
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (EatsRNA)
- HelmholtzAI
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- RNA structure prediction, Protein Data Bank, data filtering, AlphaFold3, data leakage, deep learning training data
- MeSH terms
- Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Software, Computational Biology, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Databases, Protein, Data Curation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review