The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There are no large series reporting the long-term results after radiological treatment of both stenosis and thrombosis in native fistulas (AVFs) and prosthetic grafts. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1999, 726 dilations, 135 stent placements and 257 declotting procedures were performed in 209 consecutive forearm AVFs, 74 upper arm AVFs and 156 prosthetic grafts. The stents used were the Wallstent*, the Craggstent*, and the Passager*. Declotting was performed by manual catheter-directed thromboaspiration, with or without previous urokinase infusion. RESULTS: The initial success rates ranged from 78 to 98%. The rate of significant complications was 2%. Primary patency rates at 1 year were twice as good for forearm AVFs (50%) than for grafts (25%) (P<0.05), and were 34% for upper arm AVFs. Secondary patency rates were similar in the 3 groups at 1 year (80-86%) and at 2 years (68-80%). Reintervention was necessary every 18 months in forearm AVFs compared to every 9 months in grafts (P<0.05). Thrombosed grafts fared worse than failing grafts. Accesses of less than 1 year's duration needed more reinterventions than older accesses (every 16 months versus 30 in forearm AVFs, every 7 months versus 13 in grafts, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis access achieves patency rates similar to those reported in the surgical literature and confirms that grafts must be avoided as much as possible given their poorer outcome, especially after the first thrombosis. Poorer outcome is also demonstrated in accesses of less than 1 year's duration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lee, T., & Roy-Chaudhury, P. (2009) · Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease · doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2009.06.009 · Cited by 287
Guía Clínica Española del Acceso Vascular para Hemodiálisis
Ibeas, J., Roca-Tey, R., Vallespín, J., Moreno, T., Moñux, G., Martí-Monrós, A., del Pozo, J. L., Gruss, E., Ramírez de Arellano, M., Fontseré, N., et al. (2017) · Nefrología · doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2017.11.004 · Cited by 214
Practice patterns in the management of arteriovenous fistula stenosis: a northern Italian survey
Tessitore, N., Bedogna, V., Poli, A., Impedovo, A., Antonucci, F., Teodori, T., Lupo, A., & On behalf of the Triveneto Section of the Italian Society of Nephrology (2006) · Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1093/joneph/19.2.200 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Turmel‐Rodrigues, L., Pengloan, J., Baudin, S., Testou, D., Abaza, M., Dahdah, G., Mouton, A., & Blanchard, D.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2029-2036
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2114153597
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/15.12.2029
- The paper
- Turmel‐Rodrigues, L., Pengloan, J., Baudin, S., Testou, D., Abaza, M., Dahdah, G., Mouton, A., & Blanchard, D. (2000). Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.12.2029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.