Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 628

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphology of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with end-stage renal failure

Open access
Schwarz, Ute, Buzello, Moriz, Ritz, Eberhard, Stein, Günter, Raabe, Gerd, Wiest, Gabriele, Mall, Gerhard, Amann, Kerstin·2000·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An excessive rate of cardiac death is a well-known feature of renal failure. Coronary heart disease is frequent and the possibility has been raised that the natural history of the coronary plaque is different in uraemic patients. We assessed the morphology of coronary arteries in patients with end-stage renal failure and compared them with coronary arteries of matched non-uraemic control patients. METHODS: Fifty-four cases were identified at autopsy who met the inclusion criteria: cases, end-stage renal disease (n=27); controls, non-renal patients with coronary artery disease (n=27). At autopsy all three coronary arteries were prepared at corresponding sites for investigations: (i) qualitative analysis (after Stary), (ii) quantitative measurements of intima and media thickness (by planimetry), (iii) immunohistochemical analysis of the coronary plaques and (iv) X-ray diffraction of selected calcified plaques. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis of the coronary arteries showed significantly more calcified plaques of coronary arteries in patients with end-stage renal failure. Plaques of non-uraemic patients were mostly fibroatheromatous. Media thickness of coronary arteries was significantly higher in uraemic patients (187+/-53 microm vs 135+/-29 microm in controls) and intima thickness tended to be higher (158+/-38 microm vs 142+/-31 microm) but this difference was not statistically significant. Plaque area (4.09+/-1. 50 mm(2) vs 4.39+/-0.88 mm(2)) was comparable in both groups. Lumen area, however, was significantly lower in end-stage renal patients. Immunohistochemical analysis of the cellular infiltrate in coronary arteries showed no major differences in these advanced plaques of uraemic and non-uraemic subjects. CONCLUSION: Coronary plaques in patients with end-stage renal failure are characterized by increased media thickness and marked calcification. In contrast to the previous opinion the most marked difference compared to non-uraemic controls does not concern the size, but the composition of the plaque. Deposition of calcium within the plaques may contribute to the high complication rate in uraemic patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/15.2.218

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 628

Metadata

Authors
Schwarz, U., Buzello, M., Ritz, E., Stein, G., Raabe, G., Wiest, G., Mall, G., & Amann, K.
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
218-223
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2134132325
Cited by
628
References
1
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphology of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with end-stage renal failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/15.2.218
The paper
Schwarz, U., Buzello, M., Ritz, E., Stein, G., Raabe, G., Wiest, G., Mall, G., & Amann, K. (2000). Morphology of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with end-stage renal failure. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.2.218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.