The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in The Netherlands: prevalence and outcome
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a phenotypically heterogeneous disease. To date the relationship between biochemical parameters and outcome is unclear. We therefore undertook a national cohort study on biochemical and clinical parameters and outcome in PH1. METHODS: Review of medical charts of all Dutch PH1 patients, who were identified by sending questionnaires to all Dutch nephrologists for children and adults. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were identified. The prevalence and incidence rates were 2.9/10(6) and 0.15/10(6)/year, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 7.3 years (range 0-57). Seventeen (30%) patients were older than 18 years at time of diagnosis, of whom 10 (59%) presented with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), in contrast to only nine (23%) of those aged under 18 years. Median age at initial symptoms was 6.0 years (range 0-50). In four of nine patients with infantile PH1, normal renal function was preserved after a median follow-up of 7.7 years (range 0.1-16). Progression to renal insufficiency was associated with the presence of nephrocalcinosis, as assessed by ultrasound (relative risk=1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.4) and with pyridoxine-unresponsiveness (relative risk=2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.2) but not with age at presentation, the extent of hyperoxaluria, or AGT activity. No apparent nephrocalcinosis was found in five of the 19 patients who presented with ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: Although more than one-half of the PH1 patients have symptoms under the age of 10 years, PH1 can present at any age. In adults, PH1 presents predominantly with ESRD, which may be due to misinterpretation of early symptoms. Although nephrocalcinosis is correlated with development of renal insufficiency, the latter can occur even in the absence of nephrocalcinosis. Pyridoxine sensitivity is associated with better outcome in PH1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Martin, P., DiMartini, A., Feng, S., Brown, R., & Fallon, M. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.26972 · Cited by 1,045
AASLD practice guidelines: Evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation†
Murray, K. F., & Carithers, R. L. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20704 · Cited by 939
Cochat, P., & Rumsby, G. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1301564 · Cited by 586
Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines
van Dalen, E. C., Caron, H. N., Dickinson, H. O., & Kremer, L. C. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003917.pub4 · Cited by 553
Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1
Garrelfs, S. F., Frishberg, Y., Hulton, S. A., Koren, M. J., O’Riordan, W. D., Cochat, P., Deschênes, G., Shasha-Lavsky, H., Saland, J. M., van’t Hoff, W. G., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2021712 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- van Woerden, C. S.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-279
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2139069224
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in The Netherlands: prevalence and outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/18.2.273
- The paper
- van Woerden, C. S. (2003). Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in The Netherlands: prevalence and outcome. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/18.2.273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.