Cited by 24Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Fibrates and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients

Open access
Goto, Hirohito, Iseri, Ken, Hida, Noriko·2024·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

Background: The high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been well described. However, the efficacy of fibrates on the risk of MACE in patients with CKD remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a nested case–control study using data from a large administrative database that included more than 1.5 million Japanese patients. We defined cases as CKD patients with incidences of MACE and matched them with controls based on age, sex, calendar year of cohort entry and CKD stage. Fibrate exposure timing was categorized as current, recent or past. A conditional logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between fibrate use and the risk of MACE. Results: Our study included 47 490 patients with CKD, with 15 830 MACE identified during a median follow-up of 9.4 months. The numbers of fibrates used during the study period were 556 (3.5%) in the case group and 1109 (3.5%) in the control group. Fibrate use was significantly associated with a decreased risk of MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.94], particularly for current (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68–0.97) and recent use (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48–0.90). Regarding the class effect of fibrates, pemafibrate use, but not bezafibrate or fenofibrate use, was significantly associated with a decreased risk of MACE (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.528–0.997). Conclusion: Recent and current fibrate use, especially pemafibrate use, was associated with a reduced risk of MACE in patients with CKD. This suggests the potential benefits of continuous fibrate therapy and the possible superiority of pemafibrate over other fibrates. However, further investigations in different populations are required to confirm the generalizability of these findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfad248

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fibrates may confer cardiovascular protection beyond their effects on lipids in patients with chronic kidney disease, as suggested by observational studies including a nested case-control analysis of pemafibrate use.

    “Patients with chronic kidney disease represent a high-risk population in whom hypertriglyceridemia is common, and fibrates may confer cardiovascular protection beyond their effects on lipids, as suggested by observational studies including a nested case–control analysis of pemafibrate use [83].”

    From Targeting triglycerides for cardiovascular risk reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes patients with CKD as at high cardiovascular risk. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports a nested case–control association between current pemafibrate use and lower MACE risk and suggests that anti-inflammatory effects may contribute alongside lipid effects. The passages do not establish that hypertriglyceridemia is common in CKD or demonstrate protection independent of lipid effects. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Drüeke TB, Massy ZA. Atherosclerosis in CKD: differences from the general population. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010; 6: 723– 35. 10.1038/nrneph.2010.143 20978469 · DOI
  2. [2]Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1296– 305. 10.1056/NEJMoa041031 15385656 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139: e1082– 143. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 30586774 PMC7403606 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Authors/Task Force Members, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis 2019; 290: 140– 205. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.08.014 31591002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996; 1302: 93– 109. 10.1016/0005-2760(96)00066-5 8695669 · DOI
  6. [9]Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1237– 45. 10.1056/NEJM198711123172001 3313041 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [10]Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 410– 8. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410604 10438259 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Yen CL, Fan PC, Lin MS et al. Fenofibrate delays the need for dialysis and reduces cardiovascular risk among patients with advanced CKD. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106: 1594– 605. 10.1210/clinem/dgab137 33677489 · DOI
  9. [12]Ho WY, Yen CL, Lee CC et al. Use of fibrates is not associated with reduced risks of mortality or cardiovascular events among ESRD patients: a national cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 907539. 10.3389/FCVM.2022.907539 36440016 PMC9681823 · DOI
  10. [14]Eba J, Nakamura K. Overview of the ethical guidelines for medical and biological research involving Human subjects in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52: 539– 44. 10.1093/jjco/hyac034 35349681 PMC9157286 · DOI
  11. [15]Nishikawa A, Yoshinaga E, Nakamura M et al. Validation study of algorithms to identify malignant tumors and serious infections in a Japanese administrative healthcare database. Ann Clin Epidemiol 2022; 4: 20– 31. 10.37737/ace.22004 38505283 PMC10760479 · DOI
  12. [19]Fruchart JC. Selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorα modulators (SPPARMα): the next generation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-agonists. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2013; 12: 82. 10.1186/1475-2840-12-82 23721199 PMC3682868 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [22]Ishibashi S, Arai H, Yokote K et al.; K-877 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate (K-877), a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator, in patients with dyslipidemia: results from a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. J Clin Lipidol 2018; 12: 173– 84. 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.10.006 29203092 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Goto, H., Iseri, K., & Hida, N.
Affiliations
SHOWA Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Goto, Hirohito
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2023-11-27
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1016-1022
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W4389099101
Cited by
24
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
fibrates, chronic kidney disease, major adverse cardiovascular events, pemafibrate, bezafibrate, fenofibrate, cardiovascular risk reduction, lipid-lowering therapy, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Fibric Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review