#2696 the effect of laxatives on reducing serum phosphate levels of probiotics in hemodialysis patients: a subanalysis of RCT
Open accessAbstract
Background and Aims: Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota in chronic kidney disease increases uremic toxin, which damage the epithelial tight junctions and increase the permeability of the intestinal wall via endotoxemia and systemic inflammation. Some articles reported that probiotics reduced the uremic toxin and decreased inflammation biomarkers in CKD patients. Meanwhile, we have already reported that oral administration of Bifidobacterium longum in a gastro-resistant seamless capsule decreases serum phosphate levels in patients receiving hemodialysis (Clin Kidney J, 5:373-374, 2012). In addition, in this congress, we reported that three-combination probiotics decreased serum phosphate levels. Meanwhile, some articles reported the relationship hypophosphatemia and laxative abuse. The aim of this subanalysis study is to evaluate the efficacy of laxatives on reducing serum phosphate levels of three-combination probiotic in patients receiving hemodialysis. Method: A 6-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at three hemodialysis centers. As probiotic therapy, of three-combination probiotics (Bio-Three) tablets, each containing 2 mg of lactomin (Streptococcus faecalis T-110), 10 mg of Clostridium butyricum TO-A, and 10 mg of Bacillus mesentericus TO-A, were used. The patients receiving hemodialysis were randomly assigned to the Bio-Three group (n = 37) and the placebo group (n = 36). In both the Bio-Three group and the placebo group, patients orally received 6 tablets 3 times daily. We evaluated the effect of probiotic on serum phosphate level and gut microbiome before and 6 months after the start of treatment. The gut microbiome composition was analyzed by a 16s rRNA gene-based sequencing protocol. In addition, in patients with laxative (n = 24), we evaluate the effect of probiotic on serum phosphate levels and gut microbiome. Results: The serum phosphate levels in the Bio-Three group significantly decreased after 6-month treatment, while did not change in the placebo group. Furthermore, the serum phosphate level in patients with Bio-Three and laxative additionally decreased. In a 16s rRNA gene-based sequencing protocol analysis, serum phosphate levels were positively correlated with the occupancy ratio of Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Sutterellaceae and were negatively correlated with the occupancy ratio of Leuconostocaceae and Lachnospiraceae in patients with Bio-Three and laxatives. Conclusion: In this subanalysis study, the effect of reducing serum phosphate levels on three-combination probiotic might be augmented by laxatives and the specific bacteria in the gut microbiome might contribute to the decrease of serum phosphate levels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The three-strain blend in Bifilac (S. faecalis T-110, C. butyricum TO-A, and B. mesentericus TO-A) lowered serum phosphate in hemodialysis patients.
“The three-strain blend in Bifilac (S. faecalis T-110, C. butyricum TO-A, and B. mesentericus TO-A) lowered serum phosphate in hemodialysis patients.49”
From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Whole-genome sequencing has identified antimicrobial resistance determinants with predicted mobilization potential, including tet(L), catA10, and ant(4′)-Ib, in some Lactobacillus sporogenes (Bacillus coagulans) formulations.
“For example, whole-genome sequencing has identified antimicrobial resistance determinants with predicted mobilization potential, including tet(L), catA10, and ant(4′)-Ib, in some Lactobacillus sporogenes (Bacillus coagulans) formulations, raising concerns regarding their quality and reliability.48,49”
From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Madhumathi, I., Ramesh, V., Rathakrishnan, B., Abirami, B., Gunasekaran, K., Kumar, T. S., Jeyasankar, P., Raja, G., Selvam, K., Rajendran, S., et al. (2026) · Gut microbes reports · doi:10.1080/29933935.2026.2668863
- Authors
- Ogawa, T., Hirasawa, E., Nishizawa, Y., & Nagano, N.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center (JP)
- Hidaka Hospital (JP)
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W4398235158
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- laxatives, serum phosphorus, probiotics, hemodialysis, gut microbiota, hypophosphatemia, uremic toxins, gut dysbiosis, Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospiraceae, Ruminococcus gnavus, Clostridium butyricum, Enterococcus faecalis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review