The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins
Abstract
Several diseases and disorders are treatable with therapeutic proteins, but some of these products may induce an immune response, especially when administered as multiple doses over prolonged periods. Antibodies are created by classical immune reactions or by the breakdown of immune tolerance; the latter is characteristic of human homologue products. Many factors influence the immunogenicity of proteins, including structural features (sequence variation and glycosylation), storage conditions (denaturation, or aggregation caused by oxidation), contaminants or impurities in the preparation, dose and length of treatment, as well as the route of administration, appropriate formulation and the genetic characteristics of patients. The clinical manifestations of antibodies directed against a given protein may include loss of efficacy, neutralization of the natural counterpart and general immune system effects (including allergy, anaphylaxis or serum sickness). An upsurge in the incidence of antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) among patients taking one particular formulation of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin-alpha, marketed as Eprex(R)/Erypo(R); Johnson & Johnson) in Europe caused widespread concern. The PRCA upsurge coincided with removal of human serum albumin from epoetin-alpha in 1998 and its replacement with glycine and polysorbate 80. Although the immunogenic potential of this particular product may have been enhanced by the way the product was stored, handled and administered, it should be noted that the subcutaneous route of administration does not confer immunogenicity per se. The possible role of micelle (polysorbate 80 plus epoetin-alpha) formation in the PRCA upsurge with Eprex is currently being investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis
van Schouwenburg, P. A., Rispens, T., & Wolbink, G. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2013.4 · Cited by 438
Impact of Product-Related Factors on Immunogenicity of Biotherapeutics
Singh, S. K. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22276 · Cited by 350
Singh, S. K., Afonina, N., Awwad, M., Bechtold-Peters, K., Blue, J. T., Chou, D., Cromwell, M., Krause, H.-J., Mahler, H.-C., Meyer, B. K., et al. (2010) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22097 · Cited by 334
Improvement of drug safety by the use of lipid-based nanocarriers
Lim, S. B., Banerjee, A., & Önyüksel, H. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.002 · Cited by 324
Nauck, M., Weinstock, R. S., Umpierrez, G. E., Guerci, B., Skrivanek, Z., & Milicevic, Z. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-2761 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Schellekens, H.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- suppl_6
- Pages
- vi3-vi9
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2165068832
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfh1092
- The paper
- Schellekens, H. (2005). Factors influencing the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh1092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.