Cited by 8Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

The obesity paradox as it relates to survival and hypertension in dialysis patients

Salahudeen, Abdulla K.·2006·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

Sir, Narkiewicz's [1] recent editorial on obesity and hypertension in the journal was timely and of interest. I have two comments and two questions. The study by Fleischmann et al. [2] and all subsequent studies have shown that obesity is only associated with better survival on haemodialysis, rather than causal to enhanced survival. This distinction is critical. The second comment is that the original and several subsequent works have demonstrated that obese patients tend to have better nutritional parameters [2,3], suggesting that better nutrition is probably the proximate mechanism for better survival rather than obesity per se. Indeed, Narkiewicz [1] is correct in pointing out that data so far does not support any better survival in obese patients on peritoneal dialysis. The curious question, therefore, has to be why. The answer may unlock the mystery-mechanism of obesity survival. Is it the high caloric intake imposed by peritoneal dialysis, and following the same line of thinking, can high caloric intake by lean patients on haemodialysis afford better survival? The second question, since there is a paradoxical association between obesity and survival in dialysis patients, is there any data to suggest that obesity is indeed associated with hypertension in patients on haemodialysis? Our study suggests that obese patients on haemodialysis may paradoxically have less severe hypertension than their lean counterparts [4].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfl099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A protective effect of obesity has been seen in hemodialysis patients, evidenced by improved survival in those with higher BMIs.

    “Lastly, a protective effect of obesity has been seen in hemodialysis patients evidenced by improved survival in those with higher BMIs (164, 307, 311).”

    From Cardiac remodeling in obesity (2008) · cites this paper as [307]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 8

Authors
Salahudeen, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Salahudeen, Abdulla K.
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2006-03-17
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1729-1729
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W1996915284
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
obesity paradox, obesity, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, survival, hypertension, nutritional status, energy intake, end-stage renal disease
MeSH terms
Renal Dialysis, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Obesity, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review