The obesity paradox as it relates to survival and hypertension in dialysis patients
Abstract
Sir, Narkiewicz's [1] recent editorial on obesity and hypertension in the journal was timely and of interest. I have two comments and two questions. The study by Fleischmann et al. [2] and all subsequent studies have shown that obesity is only associated with better survival on haemodialysis, rather than causal to enhanced survival. This distinction is critical. The second comment is that the original and several subsequent works have demonstrated that obese patients tend to have better nutritional parameters [2,3], suggesting that better nutrition is probably the proximate mechanism for better survival rather than obesity per se. Indeed, Narkiewicz [1] is correct in pointing out that data so far does not support any better survival in obese patients on peritoneal dialysis. The curious question, therefore, has to be why. The answer may unlock the mystery-mechanism of obesity survival. Is it the high caloric intake imposed by peritoneal dialysis, and following the same line of thinking, can high caloric intake by lean patients on haemodialysis afford better survival? The second question, since there is a paradoxical association between obesity and survival in dialysis patients, is there any data to suggest that obesity is indeed associated with hypertension in patients on haemodialysis? Our study suggests that obese patients on haemodialysis may paradoxically have less severe hypertension than their lean counterparts [4].
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A protective effect of obesity has been seen in hemodialysis patients, evidenced by improved survival in those with higher BMIs.
“Lastly, a protective effect of obesity has been seen in hemodialysis patients evidenced by improved survival in those with higher BMIs (164, 307, 311).”
From Cardiac remodeling in obesity (2008) · cites this paper as [307]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Salahudeen, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salahudeen, Abdulla K.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1729-1729
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W1996915284
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- obesity paradox, obesity, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, survival, hypertension, nutritional status, energy intake, end-stage renal disease
- MeSH terms
- Renal Dialysis, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Obesity, Survival Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review