Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review

Open access
Yarlagadda, S. G., Coca, S. G., Garg, A. X., Doshi, M., Poggio, E., Marcus, R. J., Parikh, C. R.·2008·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The term delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly used to describe the need for dialysis after receiving a kidney transplant. DGF increases morbidity after transplantation, prolongs hospitalization and may lead to premature graft failure. Various definitions of DGF are used in the literature without a uniformly accepted technique to identify DGF. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all of the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to identify DGF. RESULTS: We identified 18 unique definitions for DGF and 10 diagnostic techniques to identify DGF. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of heterogeneous clinical criteria to define DGF has certain limitations. It will lead to delayed and sometimes inaccurate diagnosis of DGF. Hence a diagnostic test that identifies DGF reliably and early is necessary. Heterogeneity, in the definitions used for DGF, hinders the evolution of a diagnostic technique to identify DGF, which requires a gold standard definition. We are in need of a new definition that is uniformly accepted across the kidney transplant community. The new definition will be helpful in promoting better communication among transplant professionals and aids in comparing clinical studies of diagnostic techniques to identify DGF and thus may facilitate clinical trials of interventions for the treatment of DGF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfn158

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Yarlagadda, S. G., Coca, S. G., Garg, A. X., Doshi, M., Poggio, E., Marcus, R. J., & Parikh, C. R.
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2008-04-03
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
2995-3003
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2152249240
Cited by
394
References
1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfn158
The paper
Yarlagadda, S. G., Coca, S. G., Garg, A. X., Doshi, M., Poggio, E., Marcus, R. J., & Parikh, C. R. (2008). Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn158

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.