Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Agarwal, R., Brunelli, S. M., Williams, K., Mitchell, M. D., Feldman, H. I., Umscheid, C. A.·2008·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, more than 200 cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) have been identified, primarily among patients with advanced kidney disease. Multiple studies have suggested an association between gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and NSF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this potential association. METHODS: A systematic review of studies examining the association between any GBCA and NSF was performed. A search for controlled studies was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. If controlled data for a GBCA was not available, we searched for case reports and series. Relevant data were extracted and meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Seven of 144 identified studies met inclusion criteria; gadodiamide was the sole or predominant GBCA in four of these; one study exclusively examined gadopentetate. Other GBCAs were not specifically examined in controlled or uncontrolled studies. Meta-analysis of controlled trials demonstrated a significant association between GBCA exposure and NSF [odds ratio (OR) 26.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3-69.4] and gadodiamide and NSF (OR 20.0; 95% CI 3.7-107.8). Examination of the evidence using established criteria suggested that this association was causal. CONCLUSIONS: The current state of evidence suggests an association and potentially causal link between the use of GBCAs and the development of NSF among patients with advanced kidney disease. Additional study is warranted to clarify the potential association of GBCAs other than gadodiamide with NSF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/gfn593

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Agarwal, R., Brunelli, S. M., Williams, K., Mitchell, M. D., Feldman, H. I., & Umscheid, C. A.
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2008-10-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
856-863
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2097077821
Cited by
174
References
4
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfn593
The paper
Agarwal, R., Brunelli, S. M., Williams, K., Mitchell, M. D., Feldman, H. I., & Umscheid, C. A. (2008). Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn593

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.