The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive functions in primary CNS lymphoma after single or combined modality regimens
Open accessAbstract
The standard treatment for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) involves high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy (HD-MTX) alone or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The combined modality regimen carries a substantial risk for cognitive impairment, and HD-MTX alone has been used more often recently in part to reduce neurotoxicity. In this study, we assessed cognitive functioning and quality of life in PCNSL survivors treated with WBRT + HD-MTX or HD-MTX alone. Fifty PCNSL patients in disease remission underwent a posttreatment baseline neuropsychological evaluation, and a subset of patients completed a follow-up evaluation. Quality of life and extent of white matter disease and atrophy on MRI were assessed. Comparisons according to treatment type after controlling for age and time since treatment completion showed that patients treated with HD-MTX alone had significantly higher scores on tests of selective attention and memory than patients treated with the combined modality regimen. Patients treated with WBRT + HD-MTX had impairments across most cognitive domains, and these were of sufficient severity to interfere with quality of life, as over 50% were not working due to their illness. Patients treated with HD-MTX alone did not meet criteria for cognitive impairment but scored within 1 SD below the normative sample on most tests. Patients with more extensive white matter disease had lower scores on tests of set-shifting and memory. Cognitive dysfunction was more prevalent in PCNSL survivors treated with WBRT + HD-MTX compared with patients treated with HD-MTX alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nayak, L., Iwamoto, F. M., LaCasce, A., Mukundan, S., Roemer, M. G. M., Chapuy, B., Armand, P., Rodig, S. J., & Shipp, M. A. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-01-764209 · Cited by 453
Hoang-Xuan, K., Bessell, E., Bromberg, J., Hottinger, A. F., Preusser, M., Rudà, R., Schlegel, U., Siegal, T., Soussain, C., Abacioglu, U., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00076-5 · Cited by 411
Houillier, C., Taillandier, L., Dureau, S., Lamy, T., Laadhari, M., Chinot, O., Moluçon-Chabrot, C., Soubeyran, P., Gressin, R., Choquet, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.00306 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Correa, D. D., Shi, W., Abrey, L. E., DeAngelis, L. M., Omuro, A. M., Deutsch, M. B., & Thaler, H. T.
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-108
- ISSN
- 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5866
- OpenAlex
- W2129423319
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive functions in primary CNS lymphoma after single or combined modality regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/nor186
- The paper
- Correa, D. D., Shi, W., Abrey, L. E., DeAngelis, L. M., Omuro, A. M., Deutsch, M. B., & Thaler, H. T. (2012). Cognitive functions in primary CNS lymphoma after single or combined modality regimens. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.