Cited by 16Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Caregiver perceptions of end-of-life care in patients with high-grade glioma

Open access
Fortunato, John T, Van Harn, Meredith, Haider, Sameah A, Phillips, Joel, Walbert, Tobias·2021·Neuro-Oncology Practice

Abstract

Background Patients dying from high-grade gliomas (HGG) suffer from high symptom burden in the end-of-life (EoL) phase. Family caregivers are most informed about the patient's symptoms and disease course. The aim of this study is to assess caregiver perception on quality of EoL care of HGG patients. Methods Caregivers prospectively participated in the Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview, part of the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End-of-Life Care (TIME survey). This validated survey assesses EoL care in areas such as physical comfort and emotional support, advance care planning, focus on the individual, attention to family, and coordination of care. The quality of EoL care was measured by domain scores (0 = care was always optimal, 1 = care was always suboptimal) or with a 0-10 scale. Results Of the 55 enrolled family caregivers, 44 completed the interview and rated the overall care high (8.90 ± 1.36/10), perceived that patients' wishes were respected (9.46 ± 0.95) and that they died in dignity (9.65 ± 0.98). Caregivers perceived high satisfaction with information and decision-making (0.18), advance care planning (0.19), focus on the individual (0.16), and care coordination (0.11). Attention to family (0.25) needed improvement. Only 41% of caregivers were confident that they knew what to do at the time of death and 46% felt that the healthcare team did not provide them with someone to turn to in distress. Conclusions Caregivers reported high overall satisf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nop/npaa077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortunato, J. T., Van Harn, M., Haider, S. A., Phillips, J., & Walbert, T.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Neurosurgery, Detroit, Michigan
  • Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
  • Trinity Health Grand Rapids (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Walbert, Tobias
Venue
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Published
2020-11-20
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 2054-2577 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-2585
OpenAlex
W3126522079
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuro-Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Neurosurgery
  • Hermelin Brain Tumor Center
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • Vattikuti Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
end-of-life care, high-grade glioma, family caregivers, caregiver perceptions, advance care planning, care coordination, caregiver communication, caregiver burnout, bereavement, quality of care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review