Assessing the quality of life among caregivers of patients with gliomas
Open accessAbstract
Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of gliomas in caregivers' quality of life (QoL) and to compare this specific population to other oncology caregivers and the normative population in order to find differences and understand which aspects of QoL are more impacted. Methods: The sample was composed of caregivers of patients with gliomas from the Neuro-Oncology Department of Timone University Hospital of Marseilles, France. Control caregivers were selected from different oncology departments and were matched with caregivers of patients with brain cancer on age, sex, and relationship with the patients. We used the specific CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGOQoL) to assess the impact of cancer and its treatment on caregivers' QoL. Caregivers also completed the Short Form 36 (SF36) for comparison with the French normative sample. Results: The study sample included 50 caregivers of patients with gliomas, aged 30–77 years, 28% of whom were men. When comparing specific CarGOQoL scores with those of the control caregivers, brain cancer caregivers had significantly lower scores for the burden and leisure time dimensions, with an effect size of 0.4. No significant differences between cases and controls were observed with SF36. Conclusion: Caregivers of patients with gliomas showed increased burden scores and lower scores for the leisure time dimension. This could be explained by their unique care situation, in which patients become more limited physically and cognitively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies outside neuro-oncology report substantial quality-of-life impairment among caregivers of advanced cancers, particularly where symptom burden, treatment intensity, and end-of-life caregiving predominate, which could narrow observed differences between tumour types.
“Many studies outside neuro-oncology report substantial QoL impairment among caregivers of advanced cancers, particularly where symptom burden, treatment intensity, and end-of-life caregiving predominate, which could narrow observed differences between tumour types.”
From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The absence of a pooled difference in quality of life may reflect that caregiving for other advanced cancers can also be profoundly taxing when care needs are intense.
“In that sense, the absence of a pooled difference may reflect the fact that caregiving for other advanced cancers can also be profoundly taxing when care needs are intense.20,28”
From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wei, H., Zhang, S., Tao, S., Li, J., & Liu, X. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2026.100978 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Minaya Flores, P., Berbis, J., Chinot, & Auquier, P.
- Affiliations
- School of Medicine, Aix-Marseilles University, Marseilles, France (P.M.F., J.B., P.A.); EA3279, Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, Marseilles, France (P.M.F., J.B., P.A.); Timone University Hospital, Department of Neurooncology, Marseilles, France (O.C.)
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 191-197
- ISSN
- 2054-2577 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-2585
- PMC
- PMC4369720
- OpenAlex
- W2022016679
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neuro-Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver quality of life, glioma, family caregivers, caregiver burden, leisure, brain cancer, SF-36, reference values, neuro-oncology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review