Correlates of the Use of Nicotine Pouches to Quit Other Nicotine and Tobacco Products among United States Adults: Results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Wave 7 (2022-2023)
Abstract
Background: As nicotine pouches are increasingly adopted as a harm reduction method for tobacco cessation, it is important to understand who incorporates nicotine pouches into cessation attempts. This preliminary study examined correlates of nicotine pouch use for tobacco cessation in a United States (US) nationally representative sample. Methods: Data were from Wave 7 (2022–2023) of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Outcomes were past-12-month use of nicotine pouches to quit cigarettes or other non-electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and other nicotine/tobacco products (N = 3622) and to quit ENDS (N = 1934). Predictor variables included sociodemographic, psychological, and behavioral factors. Results: Ninety individuals reported using nicotine pouches during their most recent quit attempt for non-ENDS products, while 65 individuals reported use during the quit attempt for ENDS. Multivariable regression analyses showed that males were significantly more likely to use nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS and ENDS (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio [APR] = 2.00, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.19, 3.37; APR = 6.28, 95% CI = 2.77, 14.25). Having used other methods to quit other nicotine/tobacco products was associated with higher likelihoods of having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS (APR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.48, 4.01) and ENDS (APR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.05, 3.61). Having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS was less likely to be reported by Black individuals (APR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.88). Conclusions: This preliminary study observed positive associations of male gender and use of other cessation methods and a negative association of Black race with having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use. Implications: In a national United States sample, having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use was more likely to be associated with being male and using other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation methods, but less likely to be associated with Black race. Ongoing surveillance and research examining the health effects of nicotine pouch use is warranted, particularly regarding sex and racial/ethnic differences in nicotine pouch use as a harm reduction approach for other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of ONPs is associated with increased prevalence of quit electronic nicotine delivery system (aPR = 6.28; 95% CI: 2.77-14.25) and non-ENDS (aPR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.19-3.37).
“Use of ONPs was associated with increased prevalence of quit electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) (aPR = 6.28; 95% CI: 2.77-14.25)and non-ENDS (aPR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.19-3.37)(Lee et al. 2026)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2026
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Lee, J., Ipek, S., & Weinberger, A. H.
- Venue
- Nicotine and Tobacco Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-12-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 877-883
- ISSN
- 1469-994X
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review