Cited by 63Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchool Health and Nursing Education

College students' exposure to secondhand smoke

Open access
Wolfson, Mark, McCoy, Thomas P., Sutfin, Erin L.·2009·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) is associated with morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease, lung cancer, respiratory infections, asthma, sudden infant death syndrome, and other illnesses. Although substantial numbers of college students smoke, little is known about their exposure to SHS. This paper provides data on self-reported exposure of college students to SHS. METHODS: A Web-based survey of a random sample of undergraduate students at 10 universities (eight public and two private) in North Carolina was conducted (N = 4,223). RESULTS: A total of 83% of students reported any exposure in the 7 days preceding the survey. Exposure in a restaurant or bar was the most common (reported by 65% of students), followed by exposure at home or in the same room as a smoker (55%) and in a car (38%). Being a daily or nondaily smoker, binge drinking, being a fraternity or sorority member or pledge, female gender, White race, and higher parental education levels were associated with exposure in one or more contexts. Students younger than 21 years were less likely to report exposure in a bar or restaurant and more likely to report exposure in cars or at home. The overall campus smoking rate was positively associated with reported exposure in cars, at home or in someone's room, and in any location. DISCUSSION: College administrators, other policy makers, and tobacco control advocates should take steps to reduce smoking and concomitant exposure to SHS among college students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntp100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite incongruence in smoking findings, membership in a fraternal organization leads to greater exposure to secondhand smoke, as noted by Wolfson, McCoy, and Sutfin (2009).

    “Despite this incongruence, membership in a fraternal organization leads to greater exposure to secondhand smoke, as noted by Wolfson, McCoy, and Sutfin (2009).”

    From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Wolfson, McCoy, and Sutfin, 2009

Authors
Wolfson, M., McCoy, T. P., & Sutfin, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2009-06-10
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
977-984
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2143321706
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa014007-09)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA-014007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
passive smoking, university students, tobacco control, binge drinking, smoking prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, California, Female, Humans, Male, Students, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Universities, Multivariate Analysis, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review