A systematic review describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Abstract
Aim To perform a systematic review of studies describing the prognosis of chronic fatigue (CF) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and to identify occupational outcomes from such studies. Method A literature search was used to identify all studies describing the clinical follow-up of patients following a diagnosis of CF or CFS. The prognosis is described in terms of the proportion of individuals improved during the period of follow-up. Return to work, other medical illnesses and death as outcomes are also considered, as are variables which may influence prognosis. Results Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and, for the 14 studies of subjects meeting operational criteria for CFS, the median full recovery rate was 5% (range 0-31%) and the median proportion of patients who improved during follow-up was 39.5% (range 8-63%). Less fatigue severity at baseline, a sense of control over symptoms and not attributing illness to a physical cause were all associated with a good outcome. Return to work at follow-up ranged from 8 to 30% in the three studies that considered this outcome. Conclusions Full recovery from untreated CFS is rare. The prognosis for an improvement in symptoms is less gloomy. This review looks at the course of CF/CFS without systematic intervention. However, there is increasing evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural and graded exercise therapies. Medical retirement should be postponed until a trial of such treatment has been given.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence that pain, depression, and anxiety complicate the course for patients with CFS.
“There is, however, evidence that pain, depression, and anxiety complicate the course for patients with CFS (Bentall et al., 2002; Cairns and Hotopf, 2005; Knoop et al., 2007; Kempke et al., 2010; Flo and Chalder, 2014).”
From The relationship between improvement in insomnia severity and long-term outcomes in the treatment of chronic fatigue (2018) · cites this paper as Cairns and Hotopf, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 395
- Authors
- Cairns, R., & Hotopf, M.
- Corresponding author
- Cairns, R.
- ORCID
- Hotopf, M.
- Venue
- Occupational Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-31
- ISSN
- 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8405
- OpenAlex
- W2122793115
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- chronic fatigue syndrome, chronic fatigue, prognosis, recovery rate, return to work, occupational outcomes, illness perception, perceived control, illness attribution, cognitive behavioral therapy, graded exercise therapy, medical retirement
- MeSH terms
- Fatigue, Humans, Prognosis, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Occupational Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review