The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanomedicines and nanotoxicology: some physiological principles
Abstract
Nanosized materials have been investigated as potential medicines for several decades. Consequently, a great deal of work has been conducted on how to exploit constructs of this size range in a beneficial way. Similarly, a number of the consequences from the use of these materials have already been considered. Nanosized materials do behave differently to low-molecular-weight drugs, the biological properties of nanomaterials being mainly dependent on relevant physiology and anatomy, which are reviewed in this article. Biodistribution, movement of materials through tissues, phagocytosis, opsonization and endocytosis of nanosized materials are all likely to have an impact on potential toxicity. In turn these processes are most likely to depend on the nanoparticle surface. Evidence from the literature is considered which suggests that our understanding of these areas is incomplete, and that biodistribution to specific sites can occur for nanoparticles with particular characteristics. However, our current knowledge does indicate which areas are of concern and deserve further investigation to understand how individual nanoparticles behave and what toxicity may be expected from them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs.
Kreuter, J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00122-8 · Cited by 1,107
Cited by
Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity
Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. I., & Robbie, K. (2007) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1116/1.2815690 · Cited by 3,789
Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery
Sun, C., Lee, J. S. H., & Zhang, M. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 · Cited by 2,594
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Wiklander, O. P. B., Nordin, J. Z., O'Loughlin, A., Gustafsson, Y., Corso, G., Mäger, I., Vader, P., Lee, Y., Sork, H., Seow, Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v4.26316 · Cited by 1,730
Toxicity Assessments of Multisized Gold and Silver Nanoparticles in Zebrafish Embryos
Bar‐Ilan, O., Albrecht, R. M., Fako, V. E., & Furgeson, D. Y. (2009) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200801716 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Garnett, M. C., & Kallinteri, P.
- Venue
- Occupational Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 307-311
- ISSN
- 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8405
- OpenAlex
- W2119591285
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanomedicines and nanotoxicology: some physiological principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/occmed/kql052
- The paper
- Garnett, M. C., & Kallinteri, P. (2006). Nanomedicines and nanotoxicology: some physiological principles. Occupational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.