Cited by 12Genetic diversity and population structureAvian ecology and behaviorEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Systematics and conservation of an endemic radiation of Accipiter hawks in the Caribbean islands

Catanach, Therese A, Halley, Matthew R, Allen, Julie M, Johnson, Jeff A, Thorstrom, Russell, Palhano, Samantha, Poor Thunder, Chyna, Gallardo, Julio C +1 more·2021·Ornithology

Abstract

More than one-third of the bird species found in the Caribbean are endemic to a set of neighboring islands or a single island. However, we have little knowledge of the evolutionary history of the Caribbean avifauna, and the lack of phylogenetic studies limits our understanding of the extent of endemism in the region. The Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus) occurs widely across the Americas and includes 3 endemic Caribbean taxa: venator on Puerto Rico, striatus on Hispaniola, and fringilloides on Cuba. These island populations have undergone extreme declines presumably due to ecosystem changes caused by anthropogenic factors, as well as due to severe hurricanes. Sharp-shinned Hawks, in general, and Caribbean Sharp-shinned Hawks, in particular, have not been placed in a modern phylogenetic context. However, the island taxa have historically been presumed to have some ongoing gene flow with mainland populations. Here we sequenced ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their flanking regions from 38 samples, focusing on Caribbean taxa. Using a combination of UCEs, mitochondrial genome sequences, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms, we investigated the phylogenetic relationships among Caribbean lineages and their relationships to mainland taxa. We found that Caribbean Sharp-shinned Hawks are reciprocally monophyletic in all datasets with regard to mainland populations and among island taxa (with no shared mtDNA haplotypes) and that divergence in the NADH dehydrogenase 2 gene (ND2)…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ornithology/ukab041

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catanach, T. A., Halley, M. R., Allen, J. M., Johnson, J. A., Thorstrom, R., Palhano, S., Poor Thunder, C., Gallardo, J. C., & Weckstein, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • The Peregrine Fund (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Catanach, Therese A
Venue
Ornithology
Published
2021-06-29
Volume
138
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2732-4613 (ISSN-L)
  • 0004-8038
OpenAlex
W3176892805
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Auk (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Accipiter striatus, Accipiter, island endemism, Caribbean avifauna, reciprocal monophyly, species delimitation, ultraconserved elements, mitochondrial genome, gene flow, population structure, hurricane impacts, conservation, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico, Cuba

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review