The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning
Abstract
The objective of the investigation was to study the three-dimensional growth of the face, and to examine the hypothesis that there are three-dimensional differences between the faces of boys and girls. The subjects comprised 132 British Caucasians aged 5-10 years measured by optical surface scanning in this cross-sectional study. Average scans for each age and sex subgroup were superimposed to assess the differences with age and sex. Males were generally larger than females. The greatest difference was between the facial heights and the least in the mid-facial dimensions. The face height of both sexes increased by an average of 3-4 mm annually. Mid-face prominence and width altered little. Mandibular width increased by 1-3 mm a year, rising to 3-5 mm in some years at the inferior areas of the mandibular region. Mandibular prominence also increased. Nose height and prominence and alar base width increased by 2 mm per year on average. Dorsum width changed little. Boys were generally larger than girls. Growth in facial height was greatest. Mid-face prominence and width changed little with age, whilst the prominence and width of the lower face increased more. Nasal prominence and alar base width increased at most ages. Dimensions changed more than reported by cephalometric studies, possibly as this study included the soft tissues. Refereed Scientific Paper
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The process of facial development varies in different phases of human life.
“The process of facial development varies in different phases of the human life [51–56], so it is necessary to construct age progression models for specific periods.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1016/S0301-0503(85)80034-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90043-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90646-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9416(83)90346-9 · DOI
- Bhatia, S. N. and Leighton, B. C. (1993)A Manual of Facial Growth. A Computer Analysis of Longitudinal Cephalometric Growth Data, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70049-8 · DOI
- 1931, Angle Orthodontist, 1, 45
- 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90121-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90255-2 · DOI
- 1970, Angle Orthodontist, 40, 202
- 1975, Angle Orthodontist, 45, 12
- 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90058-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80081-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90057-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/ejo/14.6.457 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90093-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(55)90112-3 · DOI
- 1992, Angle Orthodontist, 62, 23
- 1990, Angle Orthodontist, 60, 177
- 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90265-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70073-W · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4 · DOI
- 1970, Applied Optics, 9, 1461
- 10.1093/ejo/13.3.202 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9416(50)90049-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Nute, S. J., & Moss, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthodontics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 1465-3125
- 1465-3133
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review