Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning

Nute, Spencer J., Moss, James P.·2000·Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract

The objective of the investigation was to study the three-dimensional growth of the face, and to examine the hypothesis that there are three-dimensional differences between the faces of boys and girls. The subjects comprised 132 British Caucasians aged 5-10 years measured by optical surface scanning in this cross-sectional study. Average scans for each age and sex subgroup were superimposed to assess the differences with age and sex. Males were generally larger than females. The greatest difference was between the facial heights and the least in the mid-facial dimensions. The face height of both sexes increased by an average of 3-4 mm annually. Mid-face prominence and width altered little. Mandibular width increased by 1-3 mm a year, rising to 3-5 mm in some years at the inferior areas of the mandibular region. Mandibular prominence also increased. Nose height and prominence and alar base width increased by 2 mm per year on average. Dorsum width changed little. Boys were generally larger than girls. Growth in facial height was greatest. Mid-face prominence and width changed little with age, whilst the prominence and width of the lower face increased more. Nasal prominence and alar base width increased at most ages. Dimensions changed more than reported by cephalometric studies, possibly as this study included the soft tissues. Refereed Scientific Paper

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ortho/27.1.31

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1016/S0301-0503(85)80034-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90043-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90646-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0002-9416(83)90346-9 · DOI
  5. Bhatia, S. N. and Leighton, B. C. (1993)A Manual of Facial Growth. A Computer Analysis of Longitudinal Cephalometric Growth Data, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  6. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70049-8 · DOI
  7. 1931, Angle Orthodontist, 1, 45
  8. 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90121-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90255-2 · DOI
  10. 1970, Angle Orthodontist, 40, 202
  11. 1975, Angle Orthodontist, 45, 12
  12. 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90058-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80081-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90057-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/ejo/14.6.457 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90093-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0002-9416(55)90112-3 · DOI
  18. 1992, Angle Orthodontist, 62, 23
  19. 1990, Angle Orthodontist, 60, 177
  20. 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90265-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70073-W · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4 · DOI
  24. 1970, Applied Optics, 9, 1461
  25. 10.1093/ejo/13.3.202 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0002-9416(50)90049-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nute, S. J., & Moss, J. P.
Venue
Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2000-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 1465-3125
  • 1465-3133
Cited by
62
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review