Cited by 491Gothic Literature and Media AnalysisAmerican and British Literature AnalysisAyn Rand and Brontë studies

On 'Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus' (1818)

Shelley, Percy Bysshe·1993·The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 1

Abstract

"On 'Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus' (1818)" published on by null.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oseo/instance.00065579

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Late Victorian discourses of criminal pathology were, like the discourse of 'mind doctors' of the era, imbued with evaluations of moral character.

    “For the late Victorian discourses of criminal pathology themselves were, like the discourse of 'mind doctors' of the era, imbued with evaluations of moral character.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shelley, P. B.
Corresponding author
Shelley, Percy Bysshe
Venue
The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 1
Published
1993-06-17
Pages
282-491
OpenAlex
W2489411873
Cited by
491
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 23
FWCI
54.80
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › American and British Literature Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Ayn Rand and Brontë studies
Keywords
Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, Gothic fiction, science fiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review